Civil Society and Democracy

ABSTRACT Objective This study aims to provide a first‐cut empirical analysis of whether civil society promotes democratic governance or only supports specific aspects of democracy. Methods This study fits a battery of OLS regression models against cross‐national, time‐series data for 173 countries from 1900 to 2016. Results Civil society is likely to strengthen democracy: it is conducive to some dimensions of democracy but not as closely as we expected. Specifically, civil society is likely to help fulfill democracy's promise of electoral, participatory, and institutional conditions but exert little to no effect on other democratic dimensions. Conclusion This study hopes that the empirical findings will stimulate further research on civil society and democracy to obtain a more complete sense of how these essential concepts are connected to each other and the success of political systems. At a time when both civil society and democracy seem embattled in a range of locations, the real‐world relevance of this academic research becomes apparent as well.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science Quarterly
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70052
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Capital and Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Civil Society and Democracy

Seung‐Whan Choi, Patrick James
1 citations
Social Science Quarterly
Social Capital and Networks
4.20
article

Civil Society and Democracy

Seung‐Whan Choi, Patrick James
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective This study aims to provide a first‐cut empirical analysis of whether civil society promotes democratic governance or only supports specific aspects of democracy. Methods This study fits a battery of OLS regression models against cross‐national, time‐series data for 173 countries from 1900 to 2016. Results Civil society is likely to strengthen democracy: it is conducive to some dimensions of democracy but not as closely as we expected. Specifically, civil society is likely to help fulfill democracy's promise of electoral, participatory, and institutional conditions but exert little to no effect on other democratic dimensions. Conclusion This study hopes that the empirical findings will stimulate further research on civil society and democracy to obtain a more complete sense of how these essential concepts are connected to each other and the success of political systems. At a time when both civil society and democracy seem embattled in a range of locations, the real‐world relevance of this academic research becomes apparent as well.

Social Science QuarterlyVol. 106(4)
University of Southern California (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Social Capital and Networks
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Civil Society and Democracy — Seung‐Whan Choi, Patrick James · Social Science Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS