Physics-informed graph neural network for predicting fluid flow in porous media

With the rapid development of deep learning neural networks, new solutions have emerged for addressing fluid flow problems in porous media. Combining data-driven approaches with physical constraints has become a hot research direction, with physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) being the most popular hybrid model. PINNs have gained widespread attention in subsurface fluid flow simulations due to their low computational resource requirements, fast training speeds, strong generalization capabilities, and broad applicability. Despite success in homogeneous settings, standard PINNs face challenges in accurately calculating flux between irregular Eulerian cells with disparate properties and capturing global field influences on local cells. This limits their suitability for heterogeneous reservoirs and the irregular Eulerian grids frequently used in reservoir. To address these challenges, this study proposes a physics-informed graph neural network (PIGNN) model. The PIGNN model treats the entire field as a whole, integrating information from neighboring grids and physical laws into the solution for the target grid, thereby improving the accuracy of solving partial differential equations in heterogeneous and Eulerian irregular grids. The optimized model was applied to pressure field prediction in a spatially heterogeneous reservoir, achieving an average error and R 2 score of 6.710 × 10 −4 and 0.998, respectively, which confirms the effectiveness of model. Compared to the conventional PINN model, the average error was reduced by 76.93%, the average R 2 score increased by 3.56%. Moreover, evaluating robustness, training the PIGNN model using only 54% and 76% of the original data yielded average relative error reductions of 58.63% and 56.22%, respectively, compared to the PINN model. These results confirm the superior performance of this approach compared to PINN.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Petroleum Science
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2025.06.007
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physics-informed graph neural network for predicting fluid flow in porous media

Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini‐Nasab, Yu‐Bin Dong, Jiangxia Han, Mingjun Cong et al.
12 citations
Petroleum Science
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
15.88
article

Physics-informed graph neural network for predicting fluid flow in porous media

Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini‐Nasab, Yu‐Bin Dong, Jiangxia Han, Mingjun Cong, Gaofeng Zou, Liang Xue, Yue-Tian Liu, Li Liu, Haiyang Chen
article en
12 citations

Abstract

With the rapid development of deep learning neural networks, new solutions have emerged for addressing fluid flow problems in porous media. Combining data-driven approaches with physical constraints has become a hot research direction, with physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) being the most popular hybrid model. PINNs have gained widespread attention in subsurface fluid flow simulations due to their low computational resource requirements, fast training speeds, strong generalization capabilities, and broad applicability. Despite success in homogeneous settings, standard PINNs face challenges in accurately calculating flux between irregular Eulerian cells with disparate properties and capturing global field influences on local cells. This limits their suitability for heterogeneous reservoirs and the irregular Eulerian grids frequently used in reservoir. To address these challenges, this study proposes a physics-informed graph neural network (PIGNN) model. The PIGNN model treats the entire field as a whole, integrating information from neighboring grids and physical laws into the solution for the target grid, thereby improving the accuracy of solving partial differential equations in heterogeneous and Eulerian irregular grids. The optimized model was applied to pressure field prediction in a spatially heterogeneous reservoir, achieving an average error and R 2 score of 6.710 × 10 −4 and 0.998, respectively, which confirms the effectiveness of model. Compared to the conventional PINN model, the average error was reduced by 76.93%, the average R 2 score increased by 3.56%. Moreover, evaluating robustness, training the PIGNN model using only 54% and 76% of the original data yielded average relative error reductions of 58.63% and 56.22%, respectively, compared to the PINN model. These results confirm the superior performance of this approach compared to PINN.

Petroleum ScienceVol. 22(10)
Sinopec (China) (CN), Petroleum University of Technology (IR), China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), Delft University of Technology (NL)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
15.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.