The effect of multiple-enzyme treatment on in situ oral biofilm formation in healthy participants

Novel approaches for the prevention of biofilm-mediated oral diseases aim to control dental biofilms rather than eradicating bacteria in the mouth. One such approach is the use of enzymes that specifically target and degrade the dental biofilm matrix and thereby facilitate biofilm removal. Matrix-degrading enzymes have consistently shown promising results <i>in vitro</i>, but data on <i>in situ</i>-grown oral biofilms are limited. This study aimed to investigate the effect of combined treatment with mutanase, beta-glucanase and DNase on <i>in situ</i> biofilm formation and removal, microbial biofilm composition and biofilm pH. Biofilms from healthy participants were grown for 48 or 72 h on lower-jaw splints and enzyme or control-treated during (3x/day, 30 min) or after growth (30 min). Under the tested conditions, enzyme treatment had no significant effect on biofilm formation or removal compared to control, as assessed by optical coherence tomography and confocal microscopy. Likewise, enzymatic treatment did not induce significant changes in the microbial composition of the biofilms that were dominated by <i>Streptococcus</i>, <i>Haemophilus</i>, <i>Neisseria</i>, <i>Veillonella</i> and <i>Fusobacterium</i> species. The biofilm pH response to a sucrose challenge was assessed using confocal microscopy-based pH ratiometry, and the average biofilm pH was not significantly different between the intervention groups. Under the conditions employed in this study, the tested enzymes had no significant impact on <i>in situ</i> grown biofilms. The treatment regimen, the biofilm composition, or the analytical methods employed may explain the difference to previous results. Further studies are warranted to assess the therapeutic potential of multi-enzyme treatment for dental biofilm control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biofilm
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioflm.2025.100298
Primary Topic
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of multiple-enzyme treatment on in situ oral biofilm formation in healthy participants

Mette Rose Jørgensen, Andreas Møllebjerg, Pernille Dukanovic Rikvold, Sebastian Schlafer et al.
1 links
Biofilm
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
article

The effect of multiple-enzyme treatment on in situ oral biofilm formation in healthy participants

Mette Rose Jørgensen, Andreas Møllebjerg, Pernille Dukanovic Rikvold, Sebastian Schlafer, Karina Kambourakis Johnsen, Signe Maria Nielsen, Rikke Louise Meyer, M. Lund, Eero Juhani Raittio
article en

Abstract

Novel approaches for the prevention of biofilm-mediated oral diseases aim to control dental biofilms rather than eradicating bacteria in the mouth. One such approach is the use of enzymes that specifically target and degrade the dental biofilm matrix and thereby facilitate biofilm removal. Matrix-degrading enzymes have consistently shown promising results <i>in vitro</i>, but data on <i>in situ</i>-grown oral biofilms are limited. This study aimed to investigate the effect of combined treatment with mutanase, beta-glucanase and DNase on <i>in situ</i> biofilm formation and removal, microbial biofilm composition and biofilm pH. Biofilms from healthy participants were grown for 48 or 72 h on lower-jaw splints and enzyme or control-treated during (3x/day, 30 min) or after growth (30 min). Under the tested conditions, enzyme treatment had no significant effect on biofilm formation or removal compared to control, as assessed by optical coherence tomography and confocal microscopy. Likewise, enzymatic treatment did not induce significant changes in the microbial composition of the biofilms that were dominated by <i>Streptococcus</i>, <i>Haemophilus</i>, <i>Neisseria</i>, <i>Veillonella</i> and <i>Fusobacterium</i> species. The biofilm pH response to a sucrose challenge was assessed using confocal microscopy-based pH ratiometry, and the average biofilm pH was not significantly different between the intervention groups. Under the conditions employed in this study, the tested enzymes had no significant impact on <i>in situ</i> grown biofilms. The treatment regimen, the biofilm composition, or the analytical methods employed may explain the difference to previous results. Further studies are warranted to assess the therapeutic potential of multi-enzyme treatment for dental biofilm control.

BiofilmVol. 10
Novozymes (Denmark) (DK), University of Eastern Finland (FI), Aarhus University (DK)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.