Comparative analysis and types of interaction of foreign policy strategies of modern states

In modern conditions, the task of comparative analysis and identification of correlation models of foreign policy strategies of modern states remains relevant. One of the ways to solve it is connected with the consideration of foreign policy strategies in coordinate systems of systemic qualities and conflict inherent in international relations. From the point of view of a systematic approach, the foreign policy strategies of modern states can be divided depending on the level of goal-setting (the scale of goals may involve the implementation of strategies at the level of the entire system of international relations, as well as its subsystems or individual actors), as well as based on the nature of their impact on the structure of international relations (they may be aimed at changing or preserving it). Based on the modern interpretation of the phenomena of international conflict and conflict, it seems possible to identify several models of correlation or interaction of foreign policy strategies of modern states. In particular, it is proposed to consider conflict, confrontational, neutral and cooperative models as such models. In the interests of a comparative analysis of foreign policy strategies, the use of such a characteristic of international conflicts as “asymmetry” may be justified. The asymmetric nature of foreign policy strategies can manifest itself in the asymmetry of goals, means of achieving them, as well as threats.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociopolitical sciences
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33693/2223-0092-2025-15-1-82-90
Primary Topic
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis and types of interaction of foreign policy strategies of modern states

Sociopolitical sciences
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
article

Comparative analysis and types of interaction of foreign policy strategies of modern states

article en

Abstract

In modern conditions, the task of comparative analysis and identification of correlation models of foreign policy strategies of modern states remains relevant. One of the ways to solve it is connected with the consideration of foreign policy strategies in coordinate systems of systemic qualities and conflict inherent in international relations. From the point of view of a systematic approach, the foreign policy strategies of modern states can be divided depending on the level of goal-setting (the scale of goals may involve the implementation of strategies at the level of the entire system of international relations, as well as its subsystems or individual actors), as well as based on the nature of their impact on the structure of international relations (they may be aimed at changing or preserving it). Based on the modern interpretation of the phenomena of international conflict and conflict, it seems possible to identify several models of correlation or interaction of foreign policy strategies of modern states. In particular, it is proposed to consider conflict, confrontational, neutral and cooperative models as such models. In the interests of a comparative analysis of foreign policy strategies, the use of such a characteristic of international conflicts as “asymmetry” may be justified. The asymmetric nature of foreign policy strategies can manifest itself in the asymmetry of goals, means of achieving them, as well as threats.

Sociopolitical sciencesVol. 15(1)
Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Foreign Ministry (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.