Product names and descriptions matter for consumer perceptions of plant-based alternatives to meat and fish: Insights from the United Kingdom

An online survey was conducted to investigate the influence of varying product stimuli on the perception of overall appeal, tastiness, healthiness, and environmental benefit of plant-based (PB) meat alternatives (PBMAs) and plant-based fish alternatives (PBFAs) among 1407 adult British consumers. The written product stimuli varied across three factors: 1) referencing ‘vegan' or ‘plant-based’, 2) referencing animal products or animal-like use or neutral pre-cooked descriptor, and 3) information about the source of the PB ingredient (‘soy’ or ‘pea/rice’). The results revealed moderate ratings for both products, with PBMAs generally being perceived more favourably than PBFAs. Modest effects of the design factors were observed, with the most consistent effects attributed to the source of the PB ingredient. Products labelled as ‘made from pea and rice’ were perceived more favourably than those labelled ‘made from soybeans' across all attributes for both PBMAs and PBFAs. The term ‘to be used like meat/fish’ led to slightly more favourable ratings mainly for overall appeal in both products. Additionally, for PBFA products, labelling as ‘plant-based’ was slightly more favourably received than ‘vegan,’ whereas no such effect was observed for PBMAs. A strong and consistent effect of participants' dietary habits was also observed, with vegetarians and vegans generally rating PBMAs and PBFAs more favourably than omnivores and flexitarians. Taken together, these findings suggest that product names and descriptions, especially with regard to ingredient transparency and dietary habits may play significant roles in shaping consumer perceptions of PB alternatives. • Investigates consumer perceptions of plant-based (PB) alternatives to meat and fish. • Considers influence of product names and descriptions for perceptions. • Uses data from online survey with 1407 adult consumers from the United Kingdom. • PB ingredient transparency and dietary habits significantly shape consumer perceptions. • The findings have implications for the r transition toward more sustainable and plant-forward diets. • The findings help to inform product formulation, labelling and marketing strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Quality and Preference
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105624
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Product names and descriptions matter for consumer perceptions of plant-based alternatives to meat and fish: Insights from the United Kingdom

Sara R. Jaeger, Glenn Birksø Hjorth Andersen, Gastón Ares
2 citations
Food Quality and Preference
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
3.43
article

Product names and descriptions matter for consumer perceptions of plant-based alternatives to meat and fish: Insights from the United Kingdom

Sara R. Jaeger, Glenn Birksø Hjorth Andersen, Gastón Ares
article en
2 citations

Abstract

An online survey was conducted to investigate the influence of varying product stimuli on the perception of overall appeal, tastiness, healthiness, and environmental benefit of plant-based (PB) meat alternatives (PBMAs) and plant-based fish alternatives (PBFAs) among 1407 adult British consumers. The written product stimuli varied across three factors: 1) referencing ‘vegan' or ‘plant-based’, 2) referencing animal products or animal-like use or neutral pre-cooked descriptor, and 3) information about the source of the PB ingredient (‘soy’ or ‘pea/rice’). The results revealed moderate ratings for both products, with PBMAs generally being perceived more favourably than PBFAs. Modest effects of the design factors were observed, with the most consistent effects attributed to the source of the PB ingredient. Products labelled as ‘made from pea and rice’ were perceived more favourably than those labelled ‘made from soybeans' across all attributes for both PBMAs and PBFAs. The term ‘to be used like meat/fish’ led to slightly more favourable ratings mainly for overall appeal in both products. Additionally, for PBFA products, labelling as ‘plant-based’ was slightly more favourably received than ‘vegan,’ whereas no such effect was observed for PBMAs. A strong and consistent effect of participants' dietary habits was also observed, with vegetarians and vegans generally rating PBMAs and PBFAs more favourably than omnivores and flexitarians. Taken together, these findings suggest that product names and descriptions, especially with regard to ingredient transparency and dietary habits may play significant roles in shaping consumer perceptions of PB alternatives. • Investigates consumer perceptions of plant-based (PB) alternatives to meat and fish. • Considers influence of product names and descriptions for perceptions. • Uses data from online survey with 1407 adult consumers from the United Kingdom. • PB ingredient transparency and dietary habits significantly shape consumer perceptions. • The findings have implications for the r transition toward more sustainable and plant-forward diets. • The findings help to inform product formulation, labelling and marketing strategies.

Food Quality and PreferenceVol. 133
Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY), Aarhus University (DK)
Aarhus Universitet
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.