Inclusion of under-served groups in trials: an audit at a UK primary care clinical trials unit

Often, exclusions were due to the focusing of the trial for a specific group, such as older people, women, or people being treated for a specific severity of condition. However, many explicit exclusions may not have been essential, may have reduced the inclusivity of the trials and might limit the applicability of the trial's findings to people to whom the tested interventions might be relevant. These include the exclusion of people aged under 18, people without English language fluency and people without capacity to consent. All trials could have collected more informative data on under-served group status.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trials
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08893-9
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inclusion of under-served groups in trials: an audit at a UK primary care clinical trials unit

Melanie Carr, Lisa Hinton, Rebekah Burrow, Mike J Clarke et al.
Trials
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Inclusion of under-served groups in trials: an audit at a UK primary care clinical trials unit

Melanie Carr, Lisa Hinton, Rebekah Burrow, Mike J Clarke, Lucy Goddard
article en

Abstract

Often, exclusions were due to the focusing of the trial for a specific group, such as older people, women, or people being treated for a specific severity of condition. However, many explicit exclusions may not have been essential, may have reduced the inclusivity of the trials and might limit the applicability of the trial's findings to people to whom the tested interventions might be relevant. These include the exclusion of people aged under 18, people without English language fluency and people without capacity to consent. All trials could have collected more informative data on under-served group status.

TrialsVol. 26(1)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), University of Oxford (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.