Identifying and managing fraudulent participants: critical commentary from a qualitative study with older adults

We recently published findings from our qualitative study exploring the lived experiences of loneliness in later life to inform technology development. During recruitment for this study, we experienced the significant and emerging issue in qualitative research of fraudulent participants. This involved the same participant attempting to be interviewed multiple times to obtain monetary gain. By providing specific examples from our experience, we aim to raise awareness of this timely issue for the research community. We also present practical and actionable recommendations for the readership of this journal to address the methodological challenges of fraudulent participation in online qualitative interview studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Public Health
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2025.2522977
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Elder Abuse and Neglect
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying and managing fraudulent participants: critical commentary from a qualitative study with older adults

Faith Matcham, Jessica Rees, Anthea Tinker, Wei Liu
2 citations
Critical Public Health
Elder Abuse and Neglect
11.18
article

Identifying and managing fraudulent participants: critical commentary from a qualitative study with older adults

Faith Matcham, Jessica Rees, Anthea Tinker, Wei Liu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We recently published findings from our qualitative study exploring the lived experiences of loneliness in later life to inform technology development. During recruitment for this study, we experienced the significant and emerging issue in qualitative research of fraudulent participants. This involved the same participant attempting to be interviewed multiple times to obtain monetary gain. By providing specific examples from our experience, we aim to raise awareness of this timely issue for the research community. We also present practical and actionable recommendations for the readership of this journal to address the methodological challenges of fraudulent participation in online qualitative interview studies.

Critical Public HealthVol. 35(1)
University of Sussex (GB), King's College London (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Elder Abuse and Neglect
11.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.