Concept mapping and evaluation of the Clinical Scholars healthcare leadership program: understanding what makes health a shared value

Purpose As part of a formative evaluation of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s (RWJF) healthcare leadership program Clinical Scholars, we used concept mapping to understand the factors that influence making health a shared value from the perspectives of program participants and, more broadly, provide a real-world example of concept mapping as an evaluation tool for healthcare leadership programs. Design/methodology/approach Twenty-six participants in their final year of the three-year leadership program addressed the focal prompt: “What components are essential for making health a shared value?” Participant-identified factors were then rated for their level of importance across three areas of importance determined by the evaluation team (i.e. mindsets and expectations civic engagement; sense of community). Point and cluster maps were generated through hierarchical cluster analyses to identify and understand the relationships between the identified factors and their subsequent ratings of importance. Findings A four-cluster solution best fit the data, with the following identified clusters: (1) Shared Understanding and Awareness of Health; (2) Big Picture Strategies and Growth Mindset; (3) Collaboration and Community Engagement and (4) Health Equity and Inclusion. Go-zone plots within each cluster were developed to best understand the relationship between the three previously identified areas of importance. Originality/value Participants were exposed to a wide range of health equity and leadership-related concepts and tools supporting the central concept of “how to create a Culture of Health (COH).” The four above-stated concepts emerged from the participants as a way to organize and focus their collective understanding as they reached the end of their training experience. Results from the concept mapping were aligned with the overall goals of the program and RWJF-led COH initiative.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Leadership Education
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jole-03-2024-0053
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Concept mapping and evaluation of the Clinical Scholars healthcare leadership program: understanding what makes health a shared value

Michelle Song, Madison R. Walker, Cheryl C. Noble, Ellison Henry et al.
Journal of Leadership Education
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Concept mapping and evaluation of the Clinical Scholars healthcare leadership program: understanding what makes health a shared value

Michelle Song, Madison R. Walker, Cheryl C. Noble, Ellison Henry, Jessica R. Thompson, Jessica G. Burke, Giselle Corbie‐Smith, Gaurav Dave, Claudia S. P. Fernandez, Tara Carr, Jade Hollars
article en

Abstract

Purpose As part of a formative evaluation of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s (RWJF) healthcare leadership program Clinical Scholars, we used concept mapping to understand the factors that influence making health a shared value from the perspectives of program participants and, more broadly, provide a real-world example of concept mapping as an evaluation tool for healthcare leadership programs. Design/methodology/approach Twenty-six participants in their final year of the three-year leadership program addressed the focal prompt: “What components are essential for making health a shared value?” Participant-identified factors were then rated for their level of importance across three areas of importance determined by the evaluation team (i.e. mindsets and expectations civic engagement; sense of community). Point and cluster maps were generated through hierarchical cluster analyses to identify and understand the relationships between the identified factors and their subsequent ratings of importance. Findings A four-cluster solution best fit the data, with the following identified clusters: (1) Shared Understanding and Awareness of Health; (2) Big Picture Strategies and Growth Mindset; (3) Collaboration and Community Engagement and (4) Health Equity and Inclusion. Go-zone plots within each cluster were developed to best understand the relationship between the three previously identified areas of importance. Originality/value Participants were exposed to a wide range of health equity and leadership-related concepts and tools supporting the central concept of “how to create a Culture of Health (COH).” The four above-stated concepts emerged from the participants as a way to organize and focus their collective understanding as they reached the end of their training experience. Results from the concept mapping were aligned with the overall goals of the program and RWJF-led COH initiative.

Journal of Leadership Education
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.