Current status of herbicide resistance in global cotton production: trends and perspectives

The evolution of herbicide innovations continues to deliver benefits to cotton growers, but the threat of resistant weeds with repeated application of the same active ingredients has been steadily increasing over the last 20 years. In this study, a critical overview of herbicide resistance cases in cotton production globally is reported following data retrieved from the International Herbicide-Resistant Weed Database and the scholarly literature. The first case of herbicide resistance in cotton dates back to 1973, referring to trifluralin-resistant Eleusine indica in the United States. Since then, one hundred and nineteen (119) cases refer to resistant weeds in cotton during the period from 1973 to 2020. More than three-fourths of the resistant-weed cases (76.5%) in cotton come from the United States. The cases increased dramatically after 2000. The most frequently reported broadleaf weeds with herbicide resistance are Amaranthus palmeri , Amaranthus tuberculatus , and Xanthium strumarium . The most frequently reported grasses with herbicide resistance are Eleusine indica and Sorghum halepense . Most cases of herbicide resistance refer to glyphosate (HRAC Group-9) and ALS inhibitors (HRAC Group-2), followed by microtubule assembly inhibitors (HRAC Group-3) and ACCase inhibitors (HRAC Group-1). To ensure the value of herbicides, growers must change weed control towards a more sustainable way, re-implementing an integrated approach to weed control with rotation of herbicide groups as a key principle for reducing herbicide resistance. Moreover, residual herbicides should be backed up with additional practices, such as tillage, cultivation plus chipping, and knockdown herbicides, other than glyphosate. • The cases of herbicide resistance in global cotton increased dramatically after 2000. • Over three-fourths of the resistant-weed cases in cotton come from the United States. • Most cases of herbicide resistance refer mainly to glyphosate and ALS inhibitors. • Growers must change weed control in cotton towards a more sustainable way.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crop Protection
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107320
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current status of herbicide resistance in global cotton production: trends and perspectives

Christos A. Damalas, Spyridon D. Koutroubas
4 citations
Crop Protection
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
7.00
article

Current status of herbicide resistance in global cotton production: trends and perspectives

Christos A. Damalas, Spyridon D. Koutroubas
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The evolution of herbicide innovations continues to deliver benefits to cotton growers, but the threat of resistant weeds with repeated application of the same active ingredients has been steadily increasing over the last 20 years. In this study, a critical overview of herbicide resistance cases in cotton production globally is reported following data retrieved from the International Herbicide-Resistant Weed Database and the scholarly literature. The first case of herbicide resistance in cotton dates back to 1973, referring to trifluralin-resistant Eleusine indica in the United States. Since then, one hundred and nineteen (119) cases refer to resistant weeds in cotton during the period from 1973 to 2020. More than three-fourths of the resistant-weed cases (76.5%) in cotton come from the United States. The cases increased dramatically after 2000. The most frequently reported broadleaf weeds with herbicide resistance are Amaranthus palmeri , Amaranthus tuberculatus , and Xanthium strumarium . The most frequently reported grasses with herbicide resistance are Eleusine indica and Sorghum halepense . Most cases of herbicide resistance refer to glyphosate (HRAC Group-9) and ALS inhibitors (HRAC Group-2), followed by microtubule assembly inhibitors (HRAC Group-3) and ACCase inhibitors (HRAC Group-1). To ensure the value of herbicides, growers must change weed control towards a more sustainable way, re-implementing an integrated approach to weed control with rotation of herbicide groups as a key principle for reducing herbicide resistance. Moreover, residual herbicides should be backed up with additional practices, such as tillage, cultivation plus chipping, and knockdown herbicides, other than glyphosate. • The cases of herbicide resistance in global cotton increased dramatically after 2000. • Over three-fourths of the resistant-weed cases in cotton come from the United States. • Most cases of herbicide resistance refer mainly to glyphosate and ALS inhibitors. • Growers must change weed control in cotton towards a more sustainable way.

Crop ProtectionVol. 197
Democritus University of Thrace (GR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
7.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.