The Urgency of Using Electronic Evidence in Trials as an Effort to Answer the Challenges of Law Enforcement in the Digital Era and Social Media Dynamics

The rapid advancement of information technology has transformed many aspects of legal proceedings, particularly in the area of evidence. One of the most urgent adaptations is the use of electronic evidence in court trials, especially in response to the increasing influence of social media on legal processes and public perception. This article examines the urgency of integrating electronic evidence in judicial practice in Indonesia, exploring both its legal basis and implementation challenges. Drawing on a normative legal method, the study analyzes key regulations such as the ITE Law, PERMA No. 1 of 2019, and relevant jurisprudence. The findings reveal that while electronic evidence is legally recognized, its effective application is hindered by the absence of clear procedural norms in the Criminal Procedure Code, inconsistent judicial interpretations, and the lack of technical capacity among law enforcement officers. Challenges also arise in authenticating complex digital evidence and ensuring cybersecurity within the e-court system. Despite these obstacles, the study highlights that electronic evidence significantly contributes to transparency, efficiency, and the integrity of modern trials. To optimize its use, reforms are needed in both regulatory frameworks and institutional readiness. This includes revising the Criminal Procedure Code, enhancing digital forensic training, and securing digital infrastructures. Ultimately, the use of electronic evidence is not only a technical necessity but also a strategic instrument for ensuring justice in an increasingly digital society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Social and Humanities
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v3i9.567
Primary Topic
Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Urgency of Using Electronic Evidence in Trials as an Effort to Answer the Challenges of Law Enforcement in the Digital Era and Social Media Dynamics

Bambang Soesatyo, Bambang Sujatmiko
Asian Journal of Social and Humanities
Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
article

The Urgency of Using Electronic Evidence in Trials as an Effort to Answer the Challenges of Law Enforcement in the Digital Era and Social Media Dynamics

Bambang Soesatyo, Bambang Sujatmiko
article en

Abstract

The rapid advancement of information technology has transformed many aspects of legal proceedings, particularly in the area of evidence. One of the most urgent adaptations is the use of electronic evidence in court trials, especially in response to the increasing influence of social media on legal processes and public perception. This article examines the urgency of integrating electronic evidence in judicial practice in Indonesia, exploring both its legal basis and implementation challenges. Drawing on a normative legal method, the study analyzes key regulations such as the ITE Law, PERMA No. 1 of 2019, and relevant jurisprudence. The findings reveal that while electronic evidence is legally recognized, its effective application is hindered by the absence of clear procedural norms in the Criminal Procedure Code, inconsistent judicial interpretations, and the lack of technical capacity among law enforcement officers. Challenges also arise in authenticating complex digital evidence and ensuring cybersecurity within the e-court system. Despite these obstacles, the study highlights that electronic evidence significantly contributes to transparency, efficiency, and the integrity of modern trials. To optimize its use, reforms are needed in both regulatory frameworks and institutional readiness. This includes revising the Criminal Procedure Code, enhancing digital forensic training, and securing digital infrastructures. Ultimately, the use of electronic evidence is not only a technical necessity but also a strategic instrument for ensuring justice in an increasingly digital society.

Asian Journal of Social and HumanitiesVol. 3(9)
Universitas Borobudur (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.