Economic inequality in the context of sustainable development: а geographical perspective

This article explores economic inequality as a complex societal phenomenon with both global and regional dimensions, exerting a direct impact on the trajectory of sustainable development. An interdisciplinary approach is applied, integrating economic, social, and geographical perspectives to identify the root causes and consequences of uneven distribution of material and social resources. The main objective of the research is to construct a comprehensive understanding of the spatial structure of economic inequality and to outline possible mechanisms for addressing it. The historical foundations and root causes of inequality are examined in detail, including post-colonial legacies, inequalities in access to resources, and unequal starting conditions across countries and regions.The paper reviews major theoretical approaches to inequality – such as modernization theory, dependency theory, world-systems analysis, neoliberalism, and institutionalism — and revisits them through the lens of spatial analysis. The importance of applying a geographical approach, which allows identifying territorial patterns of inequality and systematizing disparities on a global, national, and local scale, is substantiated. Modern methodologies for measuring inequality are considered, from classical statistical indices (Gini, Theil, Palma) to integrated indicators of sustainable development. The study demonstrates how spatial visualization tools (cartography, GIS technologies) enhance the understanding and comparison of regional contrasts. Particular attention is paid to the consequences of economic inequality for sustainable development, including reduced social mobility, deepening poverty, declining institutional trust, rising social tensions, and unequal access to basic services. The study argues that reducing inequality is not only a moral imperative but also a strategic priority for achieving balanced and inclusive development. Ultimately, the article validates the geographical approach as an effective tool for spatial diagnostics, strategic planning, and targeted policy-making across governance levels. Future research directions include in-depth analysis of regional case studies, exploration of the spatio-temporal dynamics of inequality, and evaluation of the effectiveness of policy instruments aimed at its mitigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Geography Journal
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26565/2076-1333-2024-37-12
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic inequality in the context of sustainable development: а geographical perspective

Kateryna Sehida, Olha Suptelo, Kostiantyn Maliarenko, Viacheslav Reshetniak
1 citations
Human Geography Journal
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
1.13
article

Economic inequality in the context of sustainable development: а geographical perspective

Kateryna Sehida, Olha Suptelo, Kostiantyn Maliarenko, Viacheslav Reshetniak
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article explores economic inequality as a complex societal phenomenon with both global and regional dimensions, exerting a direct impact on the trajectory of sustainable development. An interdisciplinary approach is applied, integrating economic, social, and geographical perspectives to identify the root causes and consequences of uneven distribution of material and social resources. The main objective of the research is to construct a comprehensive understanding of the spatial structure of economic inequality and to outline possible mechanisms for addressing it. The historical foundations and root causes of inequality are examined in detail, including post-colonial legacies, inequalities in access to resources, and unequal starting conditions across countries and regions.The paper reviews major theoretical approaches to inequality – such as modernization theory, dependency theory, world-systems analysis, neoliberalism, and institutionalism — and revisits them through the lens of spatial analysis. The importance of applying a geographical approach, which allows identifying territorial patterns of inequality and systematizing disparities on a global, national, and local scale, is substantiated. Modern methodologies for measuring inequality are considered, from classical statistical indices (Gini, Theil, Palma) to integrated indicators of sustainable development. The study demonstrates how spatial visualization tools (cartography, GIS technologies) enhance the understanding and comparison of regional contrasts. Particular attention is paid to the consequences of economic inequality for sustainable development, including reduced social mobility, deepening poverty, declining institutional trust, rising social tensions, and unequal access to basic services. The study argues that reducing inequality is not only a moral imperative but also a strategic priority for achieving balanced and inclusive development. Ultimately, the article validates the geographical approach as an effective tool for spatial diagnostics, strategic planning, and targeted policy-making across governance levels. Future research directions include in-depth analysis of regional case studies, exploration of the spatio-temporal dynamics of inequality, and evaluation of the effectiveness of policy instruments aimed at its mitigation.

Human Geography Journal(37)
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (UA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.