Advances and obstacles to unify the concept of “printability” in Ceramics Direct Ink Writing

In Additive Manufacturing, “printability” describes the ability to shape a functional 3D object from a starting material. This concept is not easy to define because it depends on several factors including material considerations (microstructure and rheological properties), as well as process parameters that cannot be evaluated by a single metric. Some printability criteria have been proposed to classify and map the rheological properties of DIW inks. However, these criteria fail to capture all the relevant rheological aspects, and to consider DIW system technical specifications, processing parameters, and final part properties, while rheological characterisation methods remain inconsistent and lack standardisation. This review tackles this gap in the field by providing an overview of literature investigating the links between rheological properties and printability for ceramics DIW. Based on recent findings, we present an overview of specific rheological tests and parameters that correlate with printing behaviour to achieve high-quality outcomes in ceramic 3D printing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open Ceramics
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceram.2025.100808
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advances and obstacles to unify the concept of “printability” in Ceramics Direct Ink Writing

Sylvain Fournier, Edwin‐Joffrey Courtial, Mathilde Maillard, Esther García‐Tuñón
3 citations
Open Ceramics
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
2.05
article

Advances and obstacles to unify the concept of “printability” in Ceramics Direct Ink Writing

Sylvain Fournier, Edwin‐Joffrey Courtial, Mathilde Maillard, Esther García‐Tuñón
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In Additive Manufacturing, “printability” describes the ability to shape a functional 3D object from a starting material. This concept is not easy to define because it depends on several factors including material considerations (microstructure and rheological properties), as well as process parameters that cannot be evaluated by a single metric. Some printability criteria have been proposed to classify and map the rheological properties of DIW inks. However, these criteria fail to capture all the relevant rheological aspects, and to consider DIW system technical specifications, processing parameters, and final part properties, while rheological characterisation methods remain inconsistent and lack standardisation. This review tackles this gap in the field by providing an overview of literature investigating the links between rheological properties and printability for ceramics DIW. Based on recent findings, we present an overview of specific rheological tests and parameters that correlate with printing behaviour to achieve high-quality outcomes in ceramic 3D printing.

Open CeramicsVol. 23
UK Research and Innovation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Advances and obstacles to unify the concept of “printability” in Ceramics Direct Ink Writing — Sylvain Fournier, Edwin‐Joffrey Courtial, et al. · Open Ceramics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS