“We though Sing from the Indus:” Hölderlin <b>’</b> s Philosophical Response to Heidegger

Central concepts of Heidegger’s later work emerge from his engagement with Hölderlin’s poetry. Therefore, commentators frequently take Hölderlin to be a patron of Heidegger's later philosophy. That Heidegger’s imaginative reading of Hölderlin is not exegetically faithful is well-known. In this paper, we critically appraise Heidegger’s engagement with Hölderlin on philosophical rather than exegetical grounds. We maintain that the ontology that can be derived from Hölderlin’s river poetry runs counter to Heidegger’s appropriation of these poems, which we show with respect to three main concepts: locality, journeying, and the distinction between “one's own” and the foreign. While Heidegger gives ontological priority to home, origins, and “one's own,” Hölderlin's philosophical vision of the “free use of one's own” does not prioritize these notions and instead remains radically open to the presence of the other. This, we argue, makes Hölderlin a philosophical opponent rather than a patron of Heidegger's thought.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2025.2519757
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Historical Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“We though Sing from the Indus:” Hölderlin ’ s Philosophical Response to Heidegger

Christian Skirke, Sidra Shahid
Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology
Philosophy and Historical Thought
article

“We though Sing from the Indus:” Hölderlin ’ s Philosophical Response to Heidegger

Christian Skirke, Sidra Shahid
article en

Abstract

Central concepts of Heidegger’s later work emerge from his engagement with Hölderlin’s poetry. Therefore, commentators frequently take Hölderlin to be a patron of Heidegger's later philosophy. That Heidegger’s imaginative reading of Hölderlin is not exegetically faithful is well-known. In this paper, we critically appraise Heidegger’s engagement with Hölderlin on philosophical rather than exegetical grounds. We maintain that the ontology that can be derived from Hölderlin’s river poetry runs counter to Heidegger’s appropriation of these poems, which we show with respect to three main concepts: locality, journeying, and the distinction between “one's own” and the foreign. While Heidegger gives ontological priority to home, origins, and “one's own,” Hölderlin's philosophical vision of the “free use of one's own” does not prioritize these notions and instead remains radically open to the presence of the other. This, we argue, makes Hölderlin a philosophical opponent rather than a patron of Heidegger's thought.

Journal of the British Society for PhenomenologyVol. 56(3)
Amsterdam University College (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Philosophy and Historical Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.