AI-enhanced nudging in public policy: why to worry and how to respond

Abstract What role can artificial intelligence (AI) play in enhancing public policy nudges and the extent to which these help people achieve their own goals? Can it help mitigate or even overcome the challenges that nudgers face in this respect? This paper discusses how AI-enhanced personalization can help make nudges more means paternalistic and thus more respectful of people’s ends. We explore the potential added value of AI by analyzing to what extent it can, (1) help identify individual preferences and (2) tailor different nudging techniques to different people based on variations in their susceptibility to those techniques. However, we also argue that the successes booked in this respect in the for-profit sector cannot simply be replicated in public policy. While AI can bring benefits to means paternalist public policy nudging, it also has predictable downsides (lower effectiveness compared to the private sector) and risks (graver consequences compared to the private sector). We discuss the practical implications of all this and propose novel strategies that both consumers and regulators can employ to respond to private AI use in nudging with the aim of safeguarding people’s autonomy and agency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mind & Society
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-025-00322-3
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-enhanced nudging in public policy: why to worry and how to respond

Bart Engelen, Stefano Calboli
4 citations
Mind & Society
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
9.08
article

AI-enhanced nudging in public policy: why to worry and how to respond

Bart Engelen, Stefano Calboli
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract What role can artificial intelligence (AI) play in enhancing public policy nudges and the extent to which these help people achieve their own goals? Can it help mitigate or even overcome the challenges that nudgers face in this respect? This paper discusses how AI-enhanced personalization can help make nudges more means paternalistic and thus more respectful of people’s ends. We explore the potential added value of AI by analyzing to what extent it can, (1) help identify individual preferences and (2) tailor different nudging techniques to different people based on variations in their susceptibility to those techniques. However, we also argue that the successes booked in this respect in the for-profit sector cannot simply be replicated in public policy. While AI can bring benefits to means paternalist public policy nudging, it also has predictable downsides (lower effectiveness compared to the private sector) and risks (graver consequences compared to the private sector). We discuss the practical implications of all this and propose novel strategies that both consumers and regulators can employ to respond to private AI use in nudging with the aim of safeguarding people’s autonomy and agency.

Mind & SocietyVol. 24(2)
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT), Tilburg University (NL)
Universiteit van Tilburg
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
9.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI-enhanced nudging in public policy: why to worry and how to respond — Bart Engelen, Stefano Calboli · Mind & Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS