Experimental Study and Performance Comparison of Different Jacking Pipes under the Effects of Concentrated Loads

Pipe jacking is one of the trenchless methods that can satisfy the majority needs of municipal pipeline construction and can be widely used all over the world. However, the construction scenarios and engineering geological environments are becoming more complex, especially jacking through the gravel or pebble stratum condition. The impacts of concentrated loads from the gravel or pebbles on the jacking pipes have not been well examined. This paper designed a concentrated load-bearing test for jacking pipes to simulate the effects under the action of pebbles or cobblestones. This study tested and compared the performance of reinforced concrete, fiber-reinforced concrete, and steel shell–reinforced concrete pipes under concentrated loads to improve their load-bearing capacity in challenging conditions. Moreover, a comparative study was conducted on the aforementioned three pipes under a concentrated load. According to the test data, pipes are more susceptible to damage under concentrated loads. The load-bearing capacity of the steel shell–reinforced concrete pipe was 39.88% and 12.77% higher than that of reinforced concrete pipe and fiber-reinforced concrete pipe, respectively. In terms of deformation ability, the fiber-reinforced concrete pipe displayed 91.55% and 39.34% higher ability than that of steel shell–reinforced concrete pipe and reinforced concrete pipe, respectively. The findings of this research have intuitive reference value for the subsequent design of pipe jacking in gravel and pebble formations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jpsea2.pseng-1692
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Study and Performance Comparison of Different Jacking Pipes under the Effects of Concentrated Loads

Zhanping Song, Hao Zhou, Hideki Shimada, Yahong Zhao et al.
1 citations
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
0.95
article

Experimental Study and Performance Comparison of Different Jacking Pipes under the Effects of Concentrated Loads

Zhanping Song, Hao Zhou, Hideki Shimada, Yahong Zhao, Baosong Ma, Peng Ma
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Pipe jacking is one of the trenchless methods that can satisfy the majority needs of municipal pipeline construction and can be widely used all over the world. However, the construction scenarios and engineering geological environments are becoming more complex, especially jacking through the gravel or pebble stratum condition. The impacts of concentrated loads from the gravel or pebbles on the jacking pipes have not been well examined. This paper designed a concentrated load-bearing test for jacking pipes to simulate the effects under the action of pebbles or cobblestones. This study tested and compared the performance of reinforced concrete, fiber-reinforced concrete, and steel shell–reinforced concrete pipes under concentrated loads to improve their load-bearing capacity in challenging conditions. Moreover, a comparative study was conducted on the aforementioned three pipes under a concentrated load. According to the test data, pipes are more susceptible to damage under concentrated loads. The load-bearing capacity of the steel shell–reinforced concrete pipe was 39.88% and 12.77% higher than that of reinforced concrete pipe and fiber-reinforced concrete pipe, respectively. In terms of deformation ability, the fiber-reinforced concrete pipe displayed 91.55% and 39.34% higher ability than that of steel shell–reinforced concrete pipe and reinforced concrete pipe, respectively. The findings of this research have intuitive reference value for the subsequent design of pipe jacking in gravel and pebble formations.

Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and PracticeVol. 16(4)
Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology (CN), Zhengzhou University (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.