Comparative analysis of aroma and phenolic compounds in strawberry nectar subjected to equivalent thermal, ohmic heating, high pressure, and pulsed electric fields processes at pilot scale

This study investigates the effects of four preservation treatments: thermal pasteurization (TP), ohmic heating (OH), high-pressure processing (HPP), and pulsed electric fields (PEF), on the aroma and phenolic compounds of strawberry nectar, under equivalent microbial inactivation conditions (5-log reduction) on pilot-scale systems. Changes during 60 days of storage at 4°C were also evaluated. HPP was the most effective method for retaining aroma compounds, with initial levels of 5.29 ± 0.03 mg/L, closely to the untreated samples, while TP showed the lowest retention (2.94 ± 0.13 mg/L). During storage, HPP-treated samples had a 41.6% reduction in aroma compounds but still the highest remaining concentrations after storage compared to the other treatments. Key aroma markers, such as mesifurane, methyl and ethyl butyrate, were significantly better preserved in HPP and PEF treated samples compared to TP and OH. Phenolic content followed a similar trend: immediately after treatment HPP and PEF samples exhibited the highest total phenolic content (TPC), including anthocyanins like pelargonidin-3-glucoside, which constituted up to 81% of total anthocyanins. Non-thermal methods (HPP and PEF) preserved phenolics better than TP, although differences between treatments were not significant after 60 days of storage. OH demonstrated intermediate performance due to its uniform heating process that minimized thermal degradation. Overall, non-thermal methods emerged as the most effective for preserving both aroma and phenolic profiles, followed by OH, while TP resulted in the greatest losses. These findings highlight the potential of non-thermal and alternative thermal technologies over thermal pasteurization to maintain the sensory and nutritional quality of fruit-based beverages. • Pilot-scale comparative analysis under equivalent microbial inactivation • Better retention of aroma compounds by non-thermal methods • Increase levels of phenolic compounds after treatment • Ohmic Heating as a promising alternative to traditional pasteurization • Reduction in aroma and phenolic compounds during storage

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
LWT
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2025.118066
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Microbial Inactivation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of aroma and phenolic compounds in strawberry nectar subjected to equivalent thermal, ohmic heating, high pressure, and pulsed electric fields processes at pilot scale

Agnes Weiß, L. Sandei, Helen Murray, Alberto Zavarise et al.
3 citations
LWT
Microbial Inactivation Methods
3.70
article

Comparative analysis of aroma and phenolic compounds in strawberry nectar subjected to equivalent thermal, ohmic heating, high pressure, and pulsed electric fields processes at pilot scale

Agnes Weiß, L. Sandei, Helen Murray, Alberto Zavarise, Mikko Hofsommer, Christian Molitor, H. Zia, Luca Cattani, Katarína Simkova, Massimiliano Rinaldi, Marc Schmidt, Sara Rainieri, Darío Javier Pavón-Vargas, S. Humel, Maja Mikulič-Petkovšek, A. Moreno Barreto, Carine Le Bourvellec, Ana Slatnar, Mario Gozzi, Jerneja Jakopič, Heidi Halbwirth, Manfred Gössinger, Astrid Gędas, Stéphane Georgé, Alema Puzović, Ibrahim Rabeeah, Francesco Guareschi, Ngoc Quynh Anh Truong, Severin Guski, Joan Sebastian Rincon-Bermeo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of four preservation treatments: thermal pasteurization (TP), ohmic heating (OH), high-pressure processing (HPP), and pulsed electric fields (PEF), on the aroma and phenolic compounds of strawberry nectar, under equivalent microbial inactivation conditions (5-log reduction) on pilot-scale systems. Changes during 60 days of storage at 4°C were also evaluated. HPP was the most effective method for retaining aroma compounds, with initial levels of 5.29 ± 0.03 mg/L, closely to the untreated samples, while TP showed the lowest retention (2.94 ± 0.13 mg/L). During storage, HPP-treated samples had a 41.6% reduction in aroma compounds but still the highest remaining concentrations after storage compared to the other treatments. Key aroma markers, such as mesifurane, methyl and ethyl butyrate, were significantly better preserved in HPP and PEF treated samples compared to TP and OH. Phenolic content followed a similar trend: immediately after treatment HPP and PEF samples exhibited the highest total phenolic content (TPC), including anthocyanins like pelargonidin-3-glucoside, which constituted up to 81% of total anthocyanins. Non-thermal methods (HPP and PEF) preserved phenolics better than TP, although differences between treatments were not significant after 60 days of storage. OH demonstrated intermediate performance due to its uniform heating process that minimized thermal degradation. Overall, non-thermal methods emerged as the most effective for preserving both aroma and phenolic profiles, followed by OH, while TP resulted in the greatest losses. These findings highlight the potential of non-thermal and alternative thermal technologies over thermal pasteurization to maintain the sensory and nutritional quality of fruit-based beverages. • Pilot-scale comparative analysis under equivalent microbial inactivation • Better retention of aroma compounds by non-thermal methods • Increase levels of phenolic compounds after treatment • Ohmic Heating as a promising alternative to traditional pasteurization • Reduction in aroma and phenolic compounds during storage

LWTVol. 228
University of Parma (IT), TU Wien (AT), University of Ljubljana (SI), Universität Hamburg (DE), Centre Technique de la Conservation des Produits Agricoles (FR), Vienna Consulting Engineers (Austria) (AT), Lega Italiana Protezione Uccelli (IT), Höhere Bundeslehranstalt und Bundesamt für Wein- und Obstbau (AT), Experimental Station for the Food Preserving Industry (IT)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Microbial Inactivation Methods
3.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.