The Impact of Allowing ChatGPT on Responses to Different Question Types in a Mid-Term Math Exam

This study investigates the impact of ChatGPT on student perfor­mance in mid-term math exams, focusing on differences in scores across various types of test questions. The findings reveal that students using Chat­GPT exhibited significantly lower average scores compared to their non-GPT counterparts, with more erratic performance patterns. In particular, Chat­GPT users struggled with complex mathematical operations, such as matrix inverses and vector multiplications. Both ChatGPT and Copilot displayed similar levels of consistency, occasionally providing incorrect or mixed an­swers, which may have contributed to the lower performance of GPT users. The study suggests that inadequate preparation and unfamiliarity with us­ing GPT during exams could also have played a role in these results. These findings raise important questions about the integration of AI tools in educa­tion, particularly in subjects like mathematics, where precision is essential. Future research should explore optimal ways to integrate AI tools like Chat­GPT into learning environments to enhance, rather than hinder, academic performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dunakavics
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63684/dk.2025.03.01
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Allowing ChatGPT on Responses to Different Question Types in a Mid-Term Math Exam

László Bognár, Antal Joós
1 citations
Dunakavics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

The Impact of Allowing ChatGPT on Responses to Different Question Types in a Mid-Term Math Exam

László Bognár, Antal Joós
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of ChatGPT on student perfor­mance in mid-term math exams, focusing on differences in scores across various types of test questions. The findings reveal that students using Chat­GPT exhibited significantly lower average scores compared to their non-GPT counterparts, with more erratic performance patterns. In particular, Chat­GPT users struggled with complex mathematical operations, such as matrix inverses and vector multiplications. Both ChatGPT and Copilot displayed similar levels of consistency, occasionally providing incorrect or mixed an­swers, which may have contributed to the lower performance of GPT users. The study suggests that inadequate preparation and unfamiliarity with us­ing GPT during exams could also have played a role in these results. These findings raise important questions about the integration of AI tools in educa­tion, particularly in subjects like mathematics, where precision is essential. Future research should explore optimal ways to integrate AI tools like Chat­GPT into learning environments to enhance, rather than hinder, academic performance.

DunakavicsVol. 13(3)
University of Dunaújváros (HU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.