Negotiating ethical and technological ought in AI governance law: a SCOT analysis of GDPR Articles 22/25 and EU AI Act Recital 27

Applies SCOT theory to show how legal norms like consent and autonomy are socially constructed

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law Ethics & Technology
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55092/let20250004
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negotiating ethical and technological ought in AI governance law: a SCOT analysis of GDPR Articles 22/25 and EU AI Act Recital 27

Nabila Khwaja, Amal Robay
Law Ethics & Technology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Negotiating ethical and technological ought in AI governance law: a SCOT analysis of GDPR Articles 22/25 and EU AI Act Recital 27

Nabila Khwaja, Amal Robay
article en

Abstract

Applies SCOT theory to show how legal norms like consent and autonomy are socially constructed

Law Ethics & Technology
Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar (QA)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Negotiating ethical and technological ought in AI governance law: a SCOT analysis of GDPR Articles 22/25 and EU AI Act Recital 27 — Nabila Khwaja, Amal Robay · Law Ethics & Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS