Developmental Trajectories of Emotional Availability Differ Between Dyads With Children With and Without Motor Delay

This study investigated associations of gross motor delay and dyadic emotional availability (EA). Data were drawn from 99 children (Mean age = 8.79 [SD = 3.2] months, 47% Female, and 67% White) with and without motor delay and their caregivers. EA was quantified from five parent-child interactions collected over 12 months. Dyads with children with significant motor delay had significantly less growth in Total EA, Child EA, Sensitivity, Responsiveness, and Involvement compared to dyads with children with typical motor development. Children with mild motor delay differed from children with typical motor development in Involvement. Severity of motor delay was associated with risk to EA in that dyads of children with more significant motor delay had more difficulties with EA over time. Trial Registration: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02593825).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infancy
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.70027
Primary Topic
Family and Disability Support Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developmental Trajectories of Emotional Availability Differ Between Dyads With Children With and Without Motor Delay

Rebecca M. Molinini, Mary S. Shall, Natalie A. Koziol, Michele A. Lobo et al.
Infancy
Family and Disability Support Research
article

Developmental Trajectories of Emotional Availability Differ Between Dyads With Children With and Without Motor Delay

Rebecca M. Molinini, Mary S. Shall, Natalie A. Koziol, Michele A. Lobo, Emily C. Marcinowski, Sarah Price, Sandra L. Willett, Stacey C. Dusing, Virginia W. Chu, James A. Bovaird, Regina T. Harbourne, Corri Stuyvenburg
article en

Abstract

This study investigated associations of gross motor delay and dyadic emotional availability (EA). Data were drawn from 99 children (Mean age = 8.79 [SD = 3.2] months, 47% Female, and 67% White) with and without motor delay and their caregivers. EA was quantified from five parent-child interactions collected over 12 months. Dyads with children with significant motor delay had significantly less growth in Total EA, Child EA, Sensitivity, Responsiveness, and Involvement compared to dyads with children with typical motor development. Children with mild motor delay differed from children with typical motor development in Involvement. Severity of motor delay was associated with risk to EA in that dyads of children with more significant motor delay had more difficulties with EA over time. Trial Registration: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02593825).

InfancyVol. 30(3)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), University of Southern California (US), Louisiana State University (US), Colorado Mesa University (US), Duquesne University (US), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), University of Minnesota Medical Center (US), University of Delaware (US)
Foundation for Physical Therapy, National Institutes of Health, Institute of Education Sciences, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Family and Disability Support Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.