Text Selection for Philosophy Courses

Which philosophical texts should instructors of philosophy choose to foster the development of philosophical skills and competences? In this paper, we would like make some steps towards answering this question by critically comparing two prominent sources of philosophical texts: the philosophical tradition and contemporary research in academic philosophy. Against the background of three basic desiderata that any philosophical text needs to satisfy in order to be eligible for usage in problem-centered educational settings that are particularly suitable for philosophical skill development, we will argue that any choice between these two sources must be sensitive to specific situational circumstances. More specifically, we will show that whether the philosophical tradition or contemporary philosophical research is in a better position to satisfy the three basic desiderata will depend on the specific topic that is taught. Furthermore, we will argue that some such topics also give rise to additional, more specific desiderata that mandate a prioritization of one of these sources of philosophical content.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching Philosophy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil2025617222
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Text Selection for Philosophy Courses

Leonard Dung, Dominik Balg
Teaching Philosophy
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
article

Text Selection for Philosophy Courses

Leonard Dung, Dominik Balg
article en

Abstract

Which philosophical texts should instructors of philosophy choose to foster the development of philosophical skills and competences? In this paper, we would like make some steps towards answering this question by critically comparing two prominent sources of philosophical texts: the philosophical tradition and contemporary research in academic philosophy. Against the background of three basic desiderata that any philosophical text needs to satisfy in order to be eligible for usage in problem-centered educational settings that are particularly suitable for philosophical skill development, we will argue that any choice between these two sources must be sensitive to specific situational circumstances. More specifically, we will show that whether the philosophical tradition or contemporary philosophical research is in a better position to satisfy the three basic desiderata will depend on the specific topic that is taught. Furthermore, we will argue that some such topics also give rise to additional, more specific desiderata that mandate a prioritization of one of these sources of philosophical content.

Teaching PhilosophyVol. 48(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.