The Robustness of AI-Classifiers in the Face of AI-Assisted Plagiarism

The release of ChatGPT marked the beginning of a new era of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted plagiarism that disrupted traditional assessment practices. In response to this existential threat, Turnitin added an AI content detector to its platform, which is the most used plagiarism detection software in most academic institutions. However, several early studies suggest that AI detectors have questionable accuracy rates, especially when dealing with English as a second language writings or modified AI texts. To explore this uncharted territory in second language writing research, the present study evaluated the performance of Turnitin AI Detector with different text types. Using a comparative descriptive research paradigm, the researchers measured and compared Turnitin's detection accuracy in four conditions: a) English as a foreign language texts, (b) AI-generated texts, (c) paraphrased AI-generated texts, and (d) humanized AI-generated texts. The results demonstrated that Turnitin had an above-average accuracy in detecting AI texts, but its accuracy dropped slightly for paraphrased text and significantly for humanized texts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.375428
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Robustness of AI-Classifiers in the Face of AI-Assisted Plagiarism

Dhari AlOtaibi, Fadi N. Sibai, Karim Hesham Shaker Ibrahim
2 citations
International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching
Academic integrity and plagiarism
4.73
article

The Robustness of AI-Classifiers in the Face of AI-Assisted Plagiarism

Dhari AlOtaibi, Fadi N. Sibai, Karim Hesham Shaker Ibrahim
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The release of ChatGPT marked the beginning of a new era of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted plagiarism that disrupted traditional assessment practices. In response to this existential threat, Turnitin added an AI content detector to its platform, which is the most used plagiarism detection software in most academic institutions. However, several early studies suggest that AI detectors have questionable accuracy rates, especially when dealing with English as a second language writings or modified AI texts. To explore this uncharted territory in second language writing research, the present study evaluated the performance of Turnitin AI Detector with different text types. Using a comparative descriptive research paradigm, the researchers measured and compared Turnitin's detection accuracy in four conditions: a) English as a foreign language texts, (b) AI-generated texts, (c) paraphrased AI-generated texts, and (d) humanized AI-generated texts. The results demonstrated that Turnitin had an above-average accuracy in detecting AI texts, but its accuracy dropped slightly for paraphrased text and significantly for humanized texts.

International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and TeachingVol. 15(1)
Gulf University for Science & Technology (KW)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.