Analysis of School Learned Helplessness and Related Variables Differences for Elementary School Seniors Using Latent Profile Analysis

This study aimed to classify types of learned helplessness in school contexts among upper-grade elementary students and to examine differences in related variables across these types. An online survey was administered to fifth‑ and sixth‑grade students attending metropolitan and non‑metropolitan elementary schools, yielding 333 valid responses for analysis. To achieve the research objectives, latent profile analysis was conducted with MPlus 8.0 to identify learned‑helplessness profiles in school settings, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with Bonferroni post hoc tests was performed in SPSS 26.0 to investigate differences in related variables across the identified profiles. The results were as follows: First, based on the latent profile analysis results, a three‑profile solution was judged most appropriate for the number of latent learned‑helplessness groups in school contexts among upper‑grade elementary students; the profiles were named “Low Helplessness” (36.0 %), “Moderate Balanced Deficit” (62.2 %), and “High Cognitive‑Emotional Deficit” (1.8 %). Second, to examine whether there were differences in related variables across learned‑helplessness profiles in school contexts among upper‑grade elementary students, an analysis of covariance was conducted, which revealed significant profile differences in self‑efficacy, perceived teacher support, and career aspirations. Moreover, Bonferroni post hoc tests of mean differences showed that the “Low Helplessness” profile had the highest means for self‑efficacy, teacher support, and career aspirations, while no significant mean differences were found between the other two profiles. Based on these findings, this study provides suggestions for application tailored to each type of learned helpless, helping upper-grade elementary students perceive academic failure as a controllable experience. These suggestions offer foundational data for developing profile‑tailored interventions to address learned helplessness among upper‑grade elementary students.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48206/kceba.2025.9.3.209
Primary Topic
Educational and Psychological Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of School Learned Helplessness and Related Variables Differences for Elementary School Seniors Using Latent Profile Analysis

Eunhye Cho, Jooyoung Byun
Educational and Psychological Assessments
article

Analysis of School Learned Helplessness and Related Variables Differences for Elementary School Seniors Using Latent Profile Analysis

Eunhye Cho, Jooyoung Byun
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to classify types of learned helplessness in school contexts among upper-grade elementary students and to examine differences in related variables across these types. An online survey was administered to fifth‑ and sixth‑grade students attending metropolitan and non‑metropolitan elementary schools, yielding 333 valid responses for analysis. To achieve the research objectives, latent profile analysis was conducted with MPlus 8.0 to identify learned‑helplessness profiles in school settings, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with Bonferroni post hoc tests was performed in SPSS 26.0 to investigate differences in related variables across the identified profiles. The results were as follows: First, based on the latent profile analysis results, a three‑profile solution was judged most appropriate for the number of latent learned‑helplessness groups in school contexts among upper‑grade elementary students; the profiles were named “Low Helplessness” (36.0 %), “Moderate Balanced Deficit” (62.2 %), and “High Cognitive‑Emotional Deficit” (1.8 %). Second, to examine whether there were differences in related variables across learned‑helplessness profiles in school contexts among upper‑grade elementary students, an analysis of covariance was conducted, which revealed significant profile differences in self‑efficacy, perceived teacher support, and career aspirations. Moreover, Bonferroni post hoc tests of mean differences showed that the “Low Helplessness” profile had the highest means for self‑efficacy, teacher support, and career aspirations, while no significant mean differences were found between the other two profiles. Based on these findings, this study provides suggestions for application tailored to each type of learned helpless, helping upper-grade elementary students perceive academic failure as a controllable experience. These suggestions offer foundational data for developing profile‑tailored interventions to address learned helplessness among upper‑grade elementary students.

Vol. 9(3)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Educational and Psychological Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.