When and how behavior change can accelerate system change (and vice versa): mapping reciprocal processes for climate change mitigation

Abstract System change and individual behavior change are often conceptualized as contrasting, mutually exclusive strategies for climate change mitigation, with system change usually considered more powerful, direct or urgent. We argue that this alleged duality is misguided and that system change and behavior change are fundamentally co-dependent: system change is often effective to the extent that it promotes individual behavior change and, vice versa, individual behavior change contributes to the critical mass that is needed to spur system change. We map four pathways that link behavior change and system change, driven by consumer activism, consumer demands, policies that address people as part of a community and the provision of collective action arrangements. Together, these pathways illustrate that system and behavior change are often interconnected and suggest promising avenues for developing climate mitigation policies that jointly promote system and behavior change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioural Public Policy
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2025.10007
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When and how behavior change can accelerate system change (and vice versa): mapping reciprocal processes for climate change mitigation

Denise T. D. de Ridder, Sander Thomaes
1 citations
Behavioural Public Policy
Environmental Education and Sustainability
2.42
article

When and how behavior change can accelerate system change (and vice versa): mapping reciprocal processes for climate change mitigation

Denise T. D. de Ridder, Sander Thomaes
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract System change and individual behavior change are often conceptualized as contrasting, mutually exclusive strategies for climate change mitigation, with system change usually considered more powerful, direct or urgent. We argue that this alleged duality is misguided and that system change and behavior change are fundamentally co-dependent: system change is often effective to the extent that it promotes individual behavior change and, vice versa, individual behavior change contributes to the critical mass that is needed to spur system change. We map four pathways that link behavior change and system change, driven by consumer activism, consumer demands, policies that address people as part of a community and the provision of collective action arrangements. Together, these pathways illustrate that system and behavior change are often interconnected and suggest promising avenues for developing climate mitigation policies that jointly promote system and behavior change.

Behavioural Public Policy
Utrecht University (NL)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When and how behavior change can accelerate system change (and vice versa): mapping reciprocal processes for climate change mitigation — Denise T. D. de Ridder, Sander Thomaes · Behavioural Public Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS