Perbandingan Lembaga Pemberantasan Narkotika: BNN (Indonesia) dan PDEA (Filipina) dalam Pilar Regulatif dan Normatif

This research compares the institutional frameworks of Indonesia’s National Narcotics Agency (BNN) and the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) through the lens of regulatory and normative pillars from W. Richard Scott’s institutional theory. Employing a qualitative descriptive method with a literature review approach, this study finds that both agencies are structurally under presidential authority but exhibit differing operational styles. BNN emphasizes preventive and rehabilitative strategies rooted in human rights values, while PDEA is characterized by a more repressive approach shaped by national security paradigms. The findings suggest that while both institutions have formal legitimacy and enforcement mechanisms, their normative orientations differ significantly, influencing public perception, legitimacy, and policy outcomes. This comparative study highlights the importance of aligning regulatory frameworks with ethical governance standards to ensure effective and humane narcotics control policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU SOSIAL POLITIK DAN HUMANIORA
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i3.5678
Primary Topic
Legal and Social Justice Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perbandingan Lembaga Pemberantasan Narkotika: BNN (Indonesia) dan PDEA (Filipina) dalam Pilar Regulatif dan Normatif

Denissa Angela Sihombing, Hauralya Salsabilla, Shahla Eliza Nurhidayah, Rudiana Rudiana et al.
JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU SOSIAL POLITIK DAN HUMANIORA
Legal and Social Justice Studies
article

Perbandingan Lembaga Pemberantasan Narkotika: BNN (Indonesia) dan PDEA (Filipina) dalam Pilar Regulatif dan Normatif

Denissa Angela Sihombing, Hauralya Salsabilla, Shahla Eliza Nurhidayah, Rudiana Rudiana, Anggita Puspa Nirwana
article en

Abstract

This research compares the institutional frameworks of Indonesia’s National Narcotics Agency (BNN) and the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) through the lens of regulatory and normative pillars from W. Richard Scott’s institutional theory. Employing a qualitative descriptive method with a literature review approach, this study finds that both agencies are structurally under presidential authority but exhibit differing operational styles. BNN emphasizes preventive and rehabilitative strategies rooted in human rights values, while PDEA is characterized by a more repressive approach shaped by national security paradigms. The findings suggest that while both institutions have formal legitimacy and enforcement mechanisms, their normative orientations differ significantly, influencing public perception, legitimacy, and policy outcomes. This comparative study highlights the importance of aligning regulatory frameworks with ethical governance standards to ensure effective and humane narcotics control policies.

JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU SOSIAL POLITIK DAN HUMANIORAVol. 4(3)
Padjadjaran University (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Legal and Social Justice Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.