Disentangling COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: the role of social imaginaries of epidemics in northern Sierra Leone

The WHO identified vaccine hesitancy as a threat to global health in 2019, but it was the COVID-19 pandemic that brought it to the fore of public discussions. Despite efforts to account for context in public health frameworks, these fail to translate into analyses that meaningfully capture the local dynamics forging vaccine hesitancy, while dominant public narratives continue to offer decontextualised and monolithic portrayals of this multifaceted phenomenon. Drawing on ethnographic insights from fieldwork conducted in northern Sierra Leone, we propose the notion of ‘social imaginaries of epidemics’ as a socio-historical lens through which to understand how people made sense of the COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing response, thereby disentangling the shared meanings that enabled vaccine hesitancy in this setting. We do this by reconstructing three key narratives that shaped how COVID-19 was being socially imagined: epidemic memories, mistrust in the governance of epidemics, and diverging health priorities. The social imaginary of COVID-19 as a disease that was ‘deadly’, ‘harmless’, ‘invisible’ or ‘fake’ continuously shifted, yet always in dialogue with shared memories of the last Ebola epidemic. The social imaginary of the COVID-19 response was shaped by existing mistrust in the state’s governance of epidemics, whereby the response was underfunded or weak as the result of the government ‘eating COVID money’ or pursuing electoral advantages. The immunisation response was socially imagined as responding to foreign instead of local priorities by disregarding food insecurity in favour of vaccines. Together, this social imaginary rendered COVID-19 vaccines useless, harmful or unimportant to many. • Dominant narratives of vaccine hesitancy are blind to socio-historical contexts • Social imaginaries help us capture the complexity of vaccine hesitancy in Sierra Leone • Public narratives rooted in local dynamics reflect how COVID-19 was socially imagined • Social imaginaries of epidemics reveal the shared meanings of vaccine hesitancy • Public health analyses of vaccine hesitancy must consider socio-historical dynamics

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100591
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disentangling COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: the role of social imaginaries of epidemics in northern Sierra Leone

Kwabena Owusu-Kyei, Clara Menéndez, Yara Alonso, Augustin E Fombah et al.
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Disentangling COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: the role of social imaginaries of epidemics in northern Sierra Leone

Kwabena Owusu-Kyei, Clara Menéndez, Yara Alonso, Augustin E Fombah, Cristina Enguita‐Fernàndez, Abu Bakarr Jalloh, Mohammed Samai
article en

Abstract

The WHO identified vaccine hesitancy as a threat to global health in 2019, but it was the COVID-19 pandemic that brought it to the fore of public discussions. Despite efforts to account for context in public health frameworks, these fail to translate into analyses that meaningfully capture the local dynamics forging vaccine hesitancy, while dominant public narratives continue to offer decontextualised and monolithic portrayals of this multifaceted phenomenon. Drawing on ethnographic insights from fieldwork conducted in northern Sierra Leone, we propose the notion of ‘social imaginaries of epidemics’ as a socio-historical lens through which to understand how people made sense of the COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing response, thereby disentangling the shared meanings that enabled vaccine hesitancy in this setting. We do this by reconstructing three key narratives that shaped how COVID-19 was being socially imagined: epidemic memories, mistrust in the governance of epidemics, and diverging health priorities. The social imaginary of COVID-19 as a disease that was ‘deadly’, ‘harmless’, ‘invisible’ or ‘fake’ continuously shifted, yet always in dialogue with shared memories of the last Ebola epidemic. The social imaginary of the COVID-19 response was shaped by existing mistrust in the state’s governance of epidemics, whereby the response was underfunded or weak as the result of the government ‘eating COVID money’ or pursuing electoral advantages. The immunisation response was socially imagined as responding to foreign instead of local priorities by disregarding food insecurity in favour of vaccines. Together, this social imaginary rendered COVID-19 vaccines useless, harmful or unimportant to many. • Dominant narratives of vaccine hesitancy are blind to socio-historical contexts • Social imaginaries help us capture the complexity of vaccine hesitancy in Sierra Leone • Public narratives rooted in local dynamics reflect how COVID-19 was socially imagined • Social imaginaries of epidemics reveal the shared meanings of vaccine hesitancy • Public health analyses of vaccine hesitancy must consider socio-historical dynamics

SSM - Qualitative Research in HealthVol. 8
University of Sierra Leone (SL), Ministry of Health and Sanitation (SL), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Manhiça Health Research Centre (MZ), Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.