Peculiarities of Censorship of Library Funds in the First Post-War Years (proceeding from the materials of the State Archive of the Kirovohrad Region)

The article highlights the peculiarities of censorship of library funds during the second half of the 1940s. The main tendencies in implementing ideological control of printed publications during the first post-war years have been analysed. It has been found that the Holovlit of the Ukrainian SSR and its local bodies (obllits), guided by the instructions of the moscow center, showed considerable activity in searching for and neutralizing “anti-Soviet” manifestations in public life, including the book and library spheres. The main aspects that have been analysed in this article are the following: lists of banned publications that were subject to removal from public libraries and the bookselling network; “purge” campaigns aimed at library collections, the result of which was the removal from libraries of literature undesirable to the authorities with its subsequent destruction; the distribution of complete library collections between different libraries; the creation of a repository of proscribed publications that the authorities considered a threat to the current regime. It has been proven that in the post-war period, the works of authors who did not support communist ideas in their work or were very distant from politics and did not want to please the ideological conjuncture in their writing, as well as the works of those who, in the opinion of the authorities, showed too emphasized national patriotism and love for Ukraine, were persecuted. This also extended to “outdated” Soviet publications (brochures of an agitational and propaganda direction of the 1920s–1930s). The article highlights the further fate of the seized publications, some of which were placed in the special storage fund — a separate book depository with limited access, which was intended to gather some of the publications banned for ideological and political reasons. Ordinary readers’ access to these funds was limited. It has been found that in the post-war period, a new work direction of the Holovlit of the Ukrainian SSR became supervision over literature that had been published in the western regions of Ukraine before 1939 and during the years of the temporary stay of the German occupiers on Soviet territory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kyiv Historical Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28925/2524-0757.2025.18
Primary Topic
Library Science and Information
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peculiarities of Censorship of Library Funds in the First Post-War Years (proceeding from the materials of the State Archive of the Kirovohrad Region)

Інна Позднякова
Kyiv Historical Studies
Library Science and Information
article

Peculiarities of Censorship of Library Funds in the First Post-War Years (proceeding from the materials of the State Archive of the Kirovohrad Region)

Інна Позднякова
article en

Abstract

The article highlights the peculiarities of censorship of library funds during the second half of the 1940s. The main tendencies in implementing ideological control of printed publications during the first post-war years have been analysed. It has been found that the Holovlit of the Ukrainian SSR and its local bodies (obllits), guided by the instructions of the moscow center, showed considerable activity in searching for and neutralizing “anti-Soviet” manifestations in public life, including the book and library spheres. The main aspects that have been analysed in this article are the following: lists of banned publications that were subject to removal from public libraries and the bookselling network; “purge” campaigns aimed at library collections, the result of which was the removal from libraries of literature undesirable to the authorities with its subsequent destruction; the distribution of complete library collections between different libraries; the creation of a repository of proscribed publications that the authorities considered a threat to the current regime. It has been proven that in the post-war period, the works of authors who did not support communist ideas in their work or were very distant from politics and did not want to please the ideological conjuncture in their writing, as well as the works of those who, in the opinion of the authorities, showed too emphasized national patriotism and love for Ukraine, were persecuted. This also extended to “outdated” Soviet publications (brochures of an agitational and propaganda direction of the 1920s–1930s). The article highlights the further fate of the seized publications, some of which were placed in the special storage fund — a separate book depository with limited access, which was intended to gather some of the publications banned for ideological and political reasons. Ordinary readers’ access to these funds was limited. It has been found that in the post-war period, a new work direction of the Holovlit of the Ukrainian SSR became supervision over literature that had been published in the western regions of Ukraine before 1939 and during the years of the temporary stay of the German occupiers on Soviet territory.

Kyiv Historical StudiesVol. 20(1)
Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University (UA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Library Science and Information
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.