Supramolecular Aggregates of Amide‐ and Urea‐Functionalized Nanographene

Controlling the morphology of supramolecular nanographene (NG) aggregates is challenging. This study confirms that amide‐ and urea‐functionalized NG undergo self‐assembly to form supramolecular aggregates with a morphology that depends on the incorporated functional group. Amide‐functionalized NG forms stacked aggregates, whereas urea‐functionalized NG organizes into network polymers. These distinct morphologies suggest that amide groups drive NG stacking, whereas urea groups support NG vertically and horizontally, likely owing to differences in the strengths of single and bifurcated NH/O hydrogen bonds. Moreover, the functional group incorporated into NG influences the gelation properties of the system. Among the two tested systems, only urea‐functionalized NG formed organogels, possibly because urea–urea hydrogen bonds, enable solvent‐molecule trapping inside the network polymers formed in these NG systems. Thus, hydrogen bonds can regulate the morphology and function of supramolecular NG aggregates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemistryEurope
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ceur.202500015
Primary Topic
Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supramolecular Aggregates of Amide‐ and Urea‐Functionalized Nanographene

Takeharu Haino, Ryo Sekiya, Haruka Moriguchi
ChemistryEurope
Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials
article

Supramolecular Aggregates of Amide‐ and Urea‐Functionalized Nanographene

Takeharu Haino, Ryo Sekiya, Haruka Moriguchi
article en

Abstract

Controlling the morphology of supramolecular nanographene (NG) aggregates is challenging. This study confirms that amide‐ and urea‐functionalized NG undergo self‐assembly to form supramolecular aggregates with a morphology that depends on the incorporated functional group. Amide‐functionalized NG forms stacked aggregates, whereas urea‐functionalized NG organizes into network polymers. These distinct morphologies suggest that amide groups drive NG stacking, whereas urea groups support NG vertically and horizontally, likely owing to differences in the strengths of single and bifurcated NH/O hydrogen bonds. Moreover, the functional group incorporated into NG influences the gelation properties of the system. Among the two tested systems, only urea‐functionalized NG formed organogels, possibly because urea–urea hydrogen bonds, enable solvent‐molecule trapping inside the network polymers formed in these NG systems. Thus, hydrogen bonds can regulate the morphology and function of supramolecular NG aggregates.

ChemistryEuropeVol. 3(4)
Hiroshima University (JP), Hirosaki University (JP), Hiroshima International University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.