Banks’ Sustainability Reporting in Brazil

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality of sustainability reporting from banks operating in Brazil from the perspective of the GRI reporting principles and the coverage of reported content and its correlation with the SDGs. We also examine whether there is some association between the quality of such reporting and some characteristics of the banks (e.g., national vs. foreign, publicly traded vs. privately held, government vs. privately controlled). We used two different methodologies proposed in existing literature to assess quality based on economic, social, and environmental contents and developed our own methodology, based on previous studies and official documents, to analyze compliance with GRI principles. The results indicate that the reports are generally of low quality, although there are some cases of medium or very low quality, demonstrating the need for improvement in their preparation. The best evaluations were for reports produced by private banks that publicly trade, are based in Brazil, and use integrated reporting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Financial Studies
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs13030114
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Banks’ Sustainability Reporting in Brazil

Manuel Castelo Branco, Ana M. Pacheco
1 citations
International Journal of Financial Studies
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
article

Banks’ Sustainability Reporting in Brazil

Manuel Castelo Branco, Ana M. Pacheco
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality of sustainability reporting from banks operating in Brazil from the perspective of the GRI reporting principles and the coverage of reported content and its correlation with the SDGs. We also examine whether there is some association between the quality of such reporting and some characteristics of the banks (e.g., national vs. foreign, publicly traded vs. privately held, government vs. privately controlled). We used two different methodologies proposed in existing literature to assess quality based on economic, social, and environmental contents and developed our own methodology, based on previous studies and official documents, to analyze compliance with GRI principles. The results indicate that the reports are generally of low quality, although there are some cases of medium or very low quality, demonstrating the need for improvement in their preparation. The best evaluations were for reports produced by private banks that publicly trade, are based in Brazil, and use integrated reporting.

International Journal of Financial StudiesVol. 13(3)
Universidade do Porto (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.