Social dialogue and social partnership: similar and peculiar

The importance of a comparative study of social partnership and social dialogue arises from several key factors. In today's society, the regulation of labor relations, the protection of workers' rights, and the maintenance of social stability are critical issues. Both social partnership and social dialogue play a vital role in facilitating agreements between the state, employers, and employees. The purpose of comparing these two mechanisms is to identify their similarities and differences, as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of each mechanism in regulating social and labor relations. The study's specific objectives include: defining the essence and key features by exploring the concepts, functions, and principles of social partnership and social dialogue; identifying similarities and differences by analyzing interaction mechanisms, regulatory instruments, and the levels of their application; evaluating effectiveness by assessing the influence of social partnership and social dialogue on social stability, workers' rights protection, and labor market development; exploring international experience by reviewing successful practices in various countries to identify and potentially implement the most effective approaches. The methodology of the study involves scientific approaches, methods, and principles for analyzing social partnership and social dialogue. systemic approach views social partnership and social dialogue as components of the broader social and labor relations system, highlighting their interconnections and influence on society; comparative approach helps to identify the similarities and differences between social partnership and social dialogue across various countries, industries, and legal systems; institutional approach investigates the role of state and non-state institutions in the formation and evolution of social partnership and social dialogue; functional approach focuses on the functions that social partnership and social dialogue serve in regulating labor and social relations. Overall, the study confirms that social partnership and social dialogue are important instruments for regulating social and labor relations, but their effectiveness depends on specific economic and political conditions.   JEL Classification: J 50, J 52, J 58, J 59

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management and Entrepreneurship Trends of Development
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26661/2522-1566/2025-2/32-05
Primary Topic
Social Sciences and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social dialogue and social partnership: similar and peculiar

Iryna Shavkun, Yana Dybchynska
Management and Entrepreneurship Trends of Development
Social Sciences and Policies
article

Social dialogue and social partnership: similar and peculiar

Iryna Shavkun, Yana Dybchynska
article en

Abstract

The importance of a comparative study of social partnership and social dialogue arises from several key factors. In today's society, the regulation of labor relations, the protection of workers' rights, and the maintenance of social stability are critical issues. Both social partnership and social dialogue play a vital role in facilitating agreements between the state, employers, and employees. The purpose of comparing these two mechanisms is to identify their similarities and differences, as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of each mechanism in regulating social and labor relations. The study's specific objectives include: defining the essence and key features by exploring the concepts, functions, and principles of social partnership and social dialogue; identifying similarities and differences by analyzing interaction mechanisms, regulatory instruments, and the levels of their application; evaluating effectiveness by assessing the influence of social partnership and social dialogue on social stability, workers' rights protection, and labor market development; exploring international experience by reviewing successful practices in various countries to identify and potentially implement the most effective approaches. The methodology of the study involves scientific approaches, methods, and principles for analyzing social partnership and social dialogue. systemic approach views social partnership and social dialogue as components of the broader social and labor relations system, highlighting their interconnections and influence on society; comparative approach helps to identify the similarities and differences between social partnership and social dialogue across various countries, industries, and legal systems; institutional approach investigates the role of state and non-state institutions in the formation and evolution of social partnership and social dialogue; functional approach focuses on the functions that social partnership and social dialogue serve in regulating labor and social relations. Overall, the study confirms that social partnership and social dialogue are important instruments for regulating social and labor relations, but their effectiveness depends on specific economic and political conditions.   JEL Classification: J 50, J 52, J 58, J 59

Management and Entrepreneurship Trends of DevelopmentVol. 2(32)
National University Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic (UA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Social Sciences and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.