Stable, but Weak: 50 Years of US Illicit Drug Policy from Nixon to Trump and Beyond

Since President Richard Nixon's 1971 declaration of a "war on drugs," federal drug policy has been built around a patchwork of institutions that have remained relatively stable despite massive changes in the drug market and drug-related harms, changing cultural norms, and structural changes in social and economic policies. Paradoxically, the authors argue that this apparent stability arises from a lack of consensus about the nature of drug use and addiction in both elite and public opinion (ideological fragmentation), leaving a modest consensus around law enforcement and, to a lesser extent, public health programs. Drug-related issues have spread into other domains of policy such as child welfare, immigration, food assistance, and general health care, where there is often vigorous contestation around the diverging goals of programs and services (policy sprawl). Support for programs and policies has also devolved to state and local governments. An unraveling of the Nixonian consensus may be underway, however, accelerated by diminished confidence in public health programs and looming cuts to federal funding for drug treatment and prevention programs. Future directions remain uncertain, but the immediate outlook suggests a retreat toward more individualistic and market-driven approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-11995184
Primary Topic
Community Health and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stable, but Weak: 50 Years of US Illicit Drug Policy from Nixon to Trump and Beyond

Alene Kennedy‐Hendricks, Brendan K. Saloner, Sachini Bandara
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law
Community Health and Development
article

Stable, but Weak: 50 Years of US Illicit Drug Policy from Nixon to Trump and Beyond

Alene Kennedy‐Hendricks, Brendan K. Saloner, Sachini Bandara
article en

Abstract

Since President Richard Nixon's 1971 declaration of a "war on drugs," federal drug policy has been built around a patchwork of institutions that have remained relatively stable despite massive changes in the drug market and drug-related harms, changing cultural norms, and structural changes in social and economic policies. Paradoxically, the authors argue that this apparent stability arises from a lack of consensus about the nature of drug use and addiction in both elite and public opinion (ideological fragmentation), leaving a modest consensus around law enforcement and, to a lesser extent, public health programs. Drug-related issues have spread into other domains of policy such as child welfare, immigration, food assistance, and general health care, where there is often vigorous contestation around the diverging goals of programs and services (policy sprawl). Support for programs and policies has also devolved to state and local governments. An unraveling of the Nixonian consensus may be underway, however, accelerated by diminished confidence in public health programs and looming cuts to federal funding for drug treatment and prevention programs. Future directions remain uncertain, but the immediate outlook suggests a retreat toward more individualistic and market-driven approaches.

Journal of Health Politics Policy and LawVol. 50(6)
Johns Hopkins University (US), John Brown University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Community Health and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.