Analysis of decision support methods in polarization introscopy systems of biological tissues and fluids

The article discusses the features of the application of decision support methods based on machine learning, fuzzy logic and neural networks in polarization introscopy systems of biological objects. It was determined that methods such as fuzzy logic, some machine learning methods (decision trees, XGBoost) and neural networks (multilayer perceptron) allow to achieve an increase in the accuracy of polarization diagnostics of BS to the level of 81-98%. However, the obtained accuracy results may be overestimated due to the imperfection of the evaluation models and methods of sample formation, which requires further research. A comparative analysis of their accuracy characteristics is presented, taking into account the input data, software implementation and the type of pathologies diagnosed in the introscopy system.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Optoelectronic Information-Power Technologies
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31649/1681-7893-2025-49-1-185-192
Primary Topic
Advanced Scientific Research Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of decision support methods in polarization introscopy systems of biological tissues and fluids

V.V. Sholota
Optoelectronic Information-Power Technologies
Advanced Scientific Research Methods
article

Analysis of decision support methods in polarization introscopy systems of biological tissues and fluids

V.V. Sholota
article en

Abstract

The article discusses the features of the application of decision support methods based on machine learning, fuzzy logic and neural networks in polarization introscopy systems of biological objects. It was determined that methods such as fuzzy logic, some machine learning methods (decision trees, XGBoost) and neural networks (multilayer perceptron) allow to achieve an increase in the accuracy of polarization diagnostics of BS to the level of 81-98%. However, the obtained accuracy results may be overestimated due to the imperfection of the evaluation models and methods of sample formation, which requires further research. A comparative analysis of their accuracy characteristics is presented, taking into account the input data, software implementation and the type of pathologies diagnosed in the introscopy system.

Optoelectronic Information-Power TechnologiesVol. 49(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Advanced Scientific Research Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.