The court of theories: a debate-style exercise for teaching motivation theories
Purpose The purpose of this study is to provide an engaging debate-style exercise to be used by college-level instructors of management, organizational behavior or leadership courses. Design/methodology/approach This activity enables students to actively teach themselves benefits and drawbacks of four competing motivation theories: goal-setting theory, expectancy theory, equity theory and reinforcement theory. Findings This debate-style activity has proven useful in both engaging students and increases the depth of their understanding of motivation theories. Originality/value This exercise is an original exercise created by the authors to better teach the four theories of motivation.
Authors
- Andrew T. Soderberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7966-0658)
- David Howe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2929-348X)
Institutions
- West Texas A&M University (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Oshkosh (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Organization Management Journal
- Published
- 2025-06-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1108/omj-06-2023-1891
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Management and Marketing Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.76