Research Bridging Theory and Practice

This study explores the potential of the Collaborative Action Research (CAR) model to bridge the gap between research and practice in geometry education. Using the Development of Geometrical Thinking (DGT) program, CAR facilitated a collaborative process among teachers and researchers through iterative cycles of planning, action, observation, and reflection. Conducted with 88 seventh-grade students and four mathematics teachers in Croatia, the study aimed to enhance geometric understanding and problem-solving skills.The CAR model translated theoretical insights into practical teaching strategies, leading to significant improvements in student learning outcomes and teacher attitudes. Teachers became more reflective practitioners, adapting methods to meet students’ needs effectively. These findings affirm CAR’s value as a framework for professional growth and sustained instructional innovation in mathematics education.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metodički obzori
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32728/mo.19.1.2024.01
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research Bridging Theory and Practice

Metodički obzori
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
article

Research Bridging Theory and Practice

article en

Abstract

This study explores the potential of the Collaborative Action Research (CAR) model to bridge the gap between research and practice in geometry education. Using the Development of Geometrical Thinking (DGT) program, CAR facilitated a collaborative process among teachers and researchers through iterative cycles of planning, action, observation, and reflection. Conducted with 88 seventh-grade students and four mathematics teachers in Croatia, the study aimed to enhance geometric understanding and problem-solving skills.The CAR model translated theoretical insights into practical teaching strategies, leading to significant improvements in student learning outcomes and teacher attitudes. Teachers became more reflective practitioners, adapting methods to meet students’ needs effectively. These findings affirm CAR’s value as a framework for professional growth and sustained instructional innovation in mathematics education.

Metodički obzoriVol. 19(1 (36))
Juraj Dobrila University of Pula (HR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.