Development and Validation of LC–MS/MS and IC–HRMS Methods for Highly Polar Pesticide Detection in Honeybees: A Multicenter Study for the Determination of Pesticides in Honeybees to Support Pollinators and Environmental Protection

The widespread use of agrochemicals raises concerns about environmental impacts, particularly on pollinators, such as bees, which serve as bioindicators of contamination. Developing methods to assess contamination risks in bioindicators supports regulatory frameworks, including EU regulations on the maximum residue limits (MRLs) for pesticides in food and the environment. This study presents the development and validation of two complementary analytical methods (LC-MS/MS and IC-HRMS) for highly polar pesticide (HPP) detection and quantification in bee matrices. Both methods were validated according to document SANTE/11312/2021 v2. LC-MS/MS was validated with a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.005 mg/kg for all the analytes. Repeatability at 0.005, 0.010, 0.020, and 0.100 mg/kg showed RSD<sub>r</sub> from 1.6% to 19.7% and recoveries between 70% and 119%. Interlaboratory precision at 0.020 mg/kg across two labs showed RSD<sub>R</sub> from 5.5% to 13.6%, with recoveries between 91% and 103%. The IC-HRMS method achieved LOQs of 0.01 mg/kg (glufosinate, N-acetyl glufosinate, MPPA, glyphosate, N-acetyl glyphosate, N-acetyl AMPA) and 0.1 mg/kg (fosetyl, phosphonic acid, AMPA), with mean recoveries in repeatability conditions from 84% to 114% and RSD<sub>r</sub> from 2% to 14%. Intralaboratory precision showed mean recoveries from 87% to 119%, with RSD<sub>wR</sub> values between 10% and 18%. These methods enable accurate monitoring of HPP contamination, supporting risk assessment and sustainable agriculture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Xenobiotics
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jox15040095
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Insect and Pesticide Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Validation of LC–MS/MS and IC–HRMS Methods for Highly Polar Pesticide Detection in Honeybees: A Multicenter Study for the Determination of Pesticides in Honeybees to Support Pollinators and Environmental Protection

Mara Gasparini, Serenella Orsini, Ivan Pecorelli, Teresa D’Amore et al.
2 citations
Journal of Xenobiotics
Insect and Pesticide Research
3.34
article

Development and Validation of LC–MS/MS and IC–HRMS Methods for Highly Polar Pesticide Detection in Honeybees: A Multicenter Study for the Determination of Pesticides in Honeybees to Support Pollinators and Environmental Protection

Mara Gasparini, Serenella Orsini, Ivan Pecorelli, Teresa D’Amore, Barbara Angelone, Katia Russo, Emanuela Verdini, Tabita Mauti, Marialuisa Borgia, Tommaso Pacini
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The widespread use of agrochemicals raises concerns about environmental impacts, particularly on pollinators, such as bees, which serve as bioindicators of contamination. Developing methods to assess contamination risks in bioindicators supports regulatory frameworks, including EU regulations on the maximum residue limits (MRLs) for pesticides in food and the environment. This study presents the development and validation of two complementary analytical methods (LC-MS/MS and IC-HRMS) for highly polar pesticide (HPP) detection and quantification in bee matrices. Both methods were validated according to document SANTE/11312/2021 v2. LC-MS/MS was validated with a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.005 mg/kg for all the analytes. Repeatability at 0.005, 0.010, 0.020, and 0.100 mg/kg showed RSD<sub>r</sub> from 1.6% to 19.7% and recoveries between 70% and 119%. Interlaboratory precision at 0.020 mg/kg across two labs showed RSD<sub>R</sub> from 5.5% to 13.6%, with recoveries between 91% and 103%. The IC-HRMS method achieved LOQs of 0.01 mg/kg (glufosinate, N-acetyl glufosinate, MPPA, glyphosate, N-acetyl glyphosate, N-acetyl AMPA) and 0.1 mg/kg (fosetyl, phosphonic acid, AMPA), with mean recoveries in repeatability conditions from 84% to 114% and RSD<sub>r</sub> from 2% to 14%. Intralaboratory precision showed mean recoveries from 87% to 119%, with RSD<sub>wR</sub> values between 10% and 18%. These methods enable accurate monitoring of HPP contamination, supporting risk assessment and sustainable agriculture.

Journal of XenobioticsVol. 15(4)
Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata (IT), Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna "Bruno Ubertini" (IT), Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Umbria e delle Marche (IT), Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Insect and Pesticide Research
3.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.