Constitutional Problem Parameters in Determining the Special Status of Surakarta

The proposal to designate Surakarta as a Special Region has reignited debates within the realm of Indonesian constitutional law. This study aims to examine the legal policy direction of the proposal by assessing its compatibility with the principles of constitutional justice and decentralization. The research employs a normative juridical approach and comparative analysis with other special regions, such as Yogyakarta and Aceh. The findings indicate that the absence of explicit legal parameters in Article 18B paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution opens space for the politicization of history and the influence of local elite interests. This study proposes two key recommendations: first, the urgency of enacting a specific law that outlines formal legal criteria for special status; second, the importance of developing a regional distinctiveness index as a data-based evaluative instrument. The study concludes that recognition of special status must be grounded in objective standards to ensure equitable decentralization and avoid symbolic, short-term political interests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Peradaban Hukum Nusantara
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62193/0k66cx03
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constitutional Problem Parameters in Determining the Special Status of Surakarta

Zulfa Zainuddin, Nana Charles Nguindip
Peradaban Hukum Nusantara
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Constitutional Problem Parameters in Determining the Special Status of Surakarta

Zulfa Zainuddin, Nana Charles Nguindip
article en

Abstract

The proposal to designate Surakarta as a Special Region has reignited debates within the realm of Indonesian constitutional law. This study aims to examine the legal policy direction of the proposal by assessing its compatibility with the principles of constitutional justice and decentralization. The research employs a normative juridical approach and comparative analysis with other special regions, such as Yogyakarta and Aceh. The findings indicate that the absence of explicit legal parameters in Article 18B paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution opens space for the politicization of history and the influence of local elite interests. This study proposes two key recommendations: first, the urgency of enacting a specific law that outlines formal legal criteria for special status; second, the importance of developing a regional distinctiveness index as a data-based evaluative instrument. The study concludes that recognition of special status must be grounded in objective standards to ensure equitable decentralization and avoid symbolic, short-term political interests.

Peradaban Hukum NusantaraVol. 2(1)
Université de Dschang (CM), Universitas Muhammadiyah Aceh (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Constitutional Problem Parameters in Determining the Special Status of Surakarta — Zulfa Zainuddin, Nana Charles Nguindip · Peradaban Hukum Nusantara (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS