Resolving Uncertainties in the Legality of Wildlife Trade to Support Better Outcomes for Wildlife and People

ABSTRACT Wildlife use and trade support the livelihoods of millions of people worldwide but also threaten thousands of species. Legal instruments, when effectively designed and implemented, can help regulate trade and mitigate negative impacts. However, activities along supply chains are rarely categorically legal or illegal, with considerable uncertainties regarding legality in the wildlife trade. These uncertainties can compromise the success of efforts to ensure, or improve, sustainability, but are often overlooked. Here, we categorize legal uncertainties in wildlife trade into three dimensions: institutional, operational, and perceptual. We explore their implications for sustainable management and discuss potential interventions to address them, drawing on examples from wildlife management and other sectors. Resolving these uncertainties can reduce unsustainable and illegal trade, strengthen traceability and enforcement, and promote equitable benefit‐sharing among actors. Our findings offer actionable insights for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers to improve the clarity and effectiveness of wildlife trade management, advancing both conservation and socio‐economic objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Letters
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.13110
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resolving Uncertainties in the Legality of Wildlife Trade to Support Better Outcomes for Wildlife and People

Leonardo Manir Feitosa, Alejandra Pizarro Choy, Daniel W. S. Challender, Chloe E. R. Hatten et al.
Conservation Letters
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Resolving Uncertainties in the Legality of Wildlife Trade to Support Better Outcomes for Wildlife and People

Leonardo Manir Feitosa, Alejandra Pizarro Choy, Daniel W. S. Challender, Chloe E. R. Hatten, Joël Djagoun, Sara Bronwen Hunter, Wahyu Nurbandi, Michelle Anagnostou, Reshu Bashyal, Sonia Dhanda, E.J. Milner‐Gulland, Hannah N. K. Sackey, Thomasina E. E. Oldfield, Takudzwa S. Mutezo
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Wildlife use and trade support the livelihoods of millions of people worldwide but also threaten thousands of species. Legal instruments, when effectively designed and implemented, can help regulate trade and mitigate negative impacts. However, activities along supply chains are rarely categorically legal or illegal, with considerable uncertainties regarding legality in the wildlife trade. These uncertainties can compromise the success of efforts to ensure, or improve, sustainability, but are often overlooked. Here, we categorize legal uncertainties in wildlife trade into three dimensions: institutional, operational, and perceptual. We explore their implications for sustainable management and discuss potential interventions to address them, drawing on examples from wildlife management and other sectors. Resolving these uncertainties can reduce unsustainable and illegal trade, strengthen traceability and enforcement, and promote equitable benefit‐sharing among actors. Our findings offer actionable insights for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers to improve the clarity and effectiveness of wildlife trade management, advancing both conservation and socio‐economic objectives.

Conservation LettersVol. 18(3)
University of Waterloo (CA), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), University of Sussex (GB), University of St Andrews (GB), Princeton University (US), Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (GB), Princeton Public Schools (US), University of Oxford (GB), Oldham Council (GB), University College London (GB), University of Hong Kong (HK)
UK Research and Innovation, University of Oxford, A.G. Leventis Foundation
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.