Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics

The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of various researchmethods used in interlanguage pragmatics to examine the development ofpragmatic competence in foreign language learners. Data collection methodsin interlanguage pragmatics are categorized into three main types: methodsfor researching spoken interaction, questionnaires, and oral and written self-reports. Methods for researching spoken interaction include the collection ofauthentic data as well as guided conversation and role-playing. Questionnaires(discourse completion tests, multiple-choice questions, and rating scales) arethe most commonly used methods in interlanguage pragmatics research due tothe ease of construction and implementation. The third type of data collectionmethod includes oral and written self-reports (interviews, diaries, and verbalprotocols). For each method, advantages and disadvantages are discussed, andresearch examples are provided. The paper concludes with a proposal for apotential study on the development of pragmatic competence among foreignlanguage learners within the Croatian educational context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Školski vjesnik
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38003/sv.74.1.15
Primary Topic
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics

Danijela Šegedin Borovina, Mirjana Semren
Školski vjesnik
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
article

Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics

Danijela Šegedin Borovina, Mirjana Semren
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of various researchmethods used in interlanguage pragmatics to examine the development ofpragmatic competence in foreign language learners. Data collection methodsin interlanguage pragmatics are categorized into three main types: methodsfor researching spoken interaction, questionnaires, and oral and written self-reports. Methods for researching spoken interaction include the collection ofauthentic data as well as guided conversation and role-playing. Questionnaires(discourse completion tests, multiple-choice questions, and rating scales) arethe most commonly used methods in interlanguage pragmatics research due tothe ease of construction and implementation. The third type of data collectionmethod includes oral and written self-reports (interviews, diaries, and verbalprotocols). For each method, advantages and disadvantages are discussed, andresearch examples are provided. The paper concludes with a proposal for apotential study on the development of pragmatic competence among foreignlanguage learners within the Croatian educational context.

Školski vjesnikVol. 74(1)
University of Split (HR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics — Danijela Šegedin Borovina, Mirjana Semren · Školski vjesnik (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS