Enhancing the Efficiency of Public Interest Litigations in China

Public interest litigation (PIL) is a relatively new form of legal action in China that aims to address specific violations of the law that greatly undermine public interest in fields such as ecological environment and resource protection, food and drug safety, and cultural heritage protection etc.. However, it is observed that PILs often last for a long time (two years on average, with extreme instances spanning up to five to ten years). As a first attempt, this article examines the reasons (1) acquisition and application of evidence, (2) judicial issue, (3) tension between legislative frameworks and practical implementation, and consequences of the lengthy duration required to resolve these public interest cases. Subsequently, the article offers policy recommendations, (1) making an innovation in evidence system to establish a national digital evidence-sharing platform with automated risk alerts, (2) reforming judicial system to create specialized cross-regional procuratorial divisions and PIL courts to unify jurisdiction, and (3) formulating targeted legislation to the country to enhance the efficiency of its PIL regime.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.bo24117
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing the Efficiency of Public Interest Litigations in China

Bao‐Jie He
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

Enhancing the Efficiency of Public Interest Litigations in China

Bao‐Jie He
article en

Abstract

Public interest litigation (PIL) is a relatively new form of legal action in China that aims to address specific violations of the law that greatly undermine public interest in fields such as ecological environment and resource protection, food and drug safety, and cultural heritage protection etc.. However, it is observed that PILs often last for a long time (two years on average, with extreme instances spanning up to five to ten years). As a first attempt, this article examines the reasons (1) acquisition and application of evidence, (2) judicial issue, (3) tension between legislative frameworks and practical implementation, and consequences of the lengthy duration required to resolve these public interest cases. Subsequently, the article offers policy recommendations, (1) making an innovation in evidence system to establish a national digital evidence-sharing platform with automated risk alerts, (2) reforming judicial system to create specialized cross-regional procuratorial divisions and PIL courts to unify jurisdiction, and (3) formulating targeted legislation to the country to enhance the efficiency of its PIL regime.

Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public MediaVol. 96(1)
Shanghai University of Political Science and Law (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enhancing the Efficiency of Public Interest Litigations in China — Bao‐Jie He · Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS