The public debate on homoparentality on the web in Brazil: virtual ethnography
Abstract In order to analyze the public debate on homoparentality on the social network Instagram in Brazil, a qualitative netnographic study was conducted. A total of 140 posts, including textual and visual data, were subjected to reflexive thematic content analysis, grounded in social identity theory. From the analysis, four themes emerged: affirmation of homoparental identities on digital social networks; construction and strengthening of the self-concept of homoparental identity; challenges in maintaining the principles of acceptance of homoparental identity; broadening the construction of in-group and out-group for the promotion of homoparental identity. The results indicate that social networks play a fundamental role in disseminating homoparental identities and provide a significant space for public debate on homoparentality, contributing to the construction of identity self-concept. The online public debate on homoparentality reveals the resistance and political mobilization of homoparental identities, despite ongoing social challenges and persistent stigmas.
Authors
- Lucas Signori (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5386-7957)
- João Caio Silva Castro Ferreira (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3497-5896)
- Anderson Reis de Sousa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8534-1960)
- Fernando Hellmann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4692-0545)
- Maiara Basseto Sena (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0182-1057)
- Sônia Silva Marcon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6607-362X)
- André Inácio da Silva (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7086-677X)
Institutions
- Universidade Estadual de Maringá (BR)
- Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR)
- Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR)
- Hospital Ana Nery (BR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232025306.16182023en
- Primary Topic
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00