Assessing the Design and Management of Protected Areas

Coastal desert ecosystems, such as the Lomas and Tillandsiales, are essential for the well-being of local populations, providing vital ecosystem goods and services, including climate regulation and water supply. These ecosystems are nationally recognized as important conservation targets. However, the Lomas and Tillandsiales in Tacna have been adversely affected and ecologically degraded due to uncontrolled population growth and inadequate regulation of human activities, such as agriculture, mining, and livestock grazing. Therefore, it is crucial to implement effective conservation strategies. Despite this need, when governmental entities delineate territories for potential protected areas, existing land use is often prioritized, leading to the exclusion of areas under current use rather than considering geographical criteria or ecological attributes of these vital ecosystems. This practice raises questions about the effectiveness of conservation efforts. To assess the proposed polygons for new protected areas by regional authorities, we compared these with natural ecosystem boundaries using various geographical tools. This comparison revealed substantial differences in geographical, ecological, and landscape metrics, indicating a decrease in ecological similarity and potentially lower effectiveness for conservation. We identified variations in geomorphological and morphometric diversity, with extreme cases showing coefficients of variability of 56% for the Gravelius index, 52% for the altitude index, and 43% for the morphometric protection index. These factors are critical as they strongly correlate with biodiversity, ecological processes, and the provision of ecosystem services, which are the main goals of conservation. Given these discrepancies, the newly proposed conservation area may inadequately fulfill its objectives. Once designated, the authorities should design and implement a management model that prioritizes expanding the protected areas to their natural limits, promoting restoration, and conducting ongoing monitoring of the metrics outlined in this research. Conservation should not merely involve declaring a spatial area as a reserve; it also requires defining these spaces based on tools and geographical knowledge to ensure the adequate protection and conservation of the Lomas and Tillandsiales ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cuadernos de Investigación Geográfica
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18172/cig.6451
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Design and Management of Protected Areas

Miguel Angel Pezo Sardón, Marco Navarro, Eduardo Oyague, Melina Paredes
Cuadernos de Investigación Geográfica
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Assessing the Design and Management of Protected Areas

Miguel Angel Pezo Sardón, Marco Navarro, Eduardo Oyague, Melina Paredes
article en

Abstract

Coastal desert ecosystems, such as the Lomas and Tillandsiales, are essential for the well-being of local populations, providing vital ecosystem goods and services, including climate regulation and water supply. These ecosystems are nationally recognized as important conservation targets. However, the Lomas and Tillandsiales in Tacna have been adversely affected and ecologically degraded due to uncontrolled population growth and inadequate regulation of human activities, such as agriculture, mining, and livestock grazing. Therefore, it is crucial to implement effective conservation strategies. Despite this need, when governmental entities delineate territories for potential protected areas, existing land use is often prioritized, leading to the exclusion of areas under current use rather than considering geographical criteria or ecological attributes of these vital ecosystems. This practice raises questions about the effectiveness of conservation efforts. To assess the proposed polygons for new protected areas by regional authorities, we compared these with natural ecosystem boundaries using various geographical tools. This comparison revealed substantial differences in geographical, ecological, and landscape metrics, indicating a decrease in ecological similarity and potentially lower effectiveness for conservation. We identified variations in geomorphological and morphometric diversity, with extreme cases showing coefficients of variability of 56% for the Gravelius index, 52% for the altitude index, and 43% for the morphometric protection index. These factors are critical as they strongly correlate with biodiversity, ecological processes, and the provision of ecosystem services, which are the main goals of conservation. Given these discrepancies, the newly proposed conservation area may inadequately fulfill its objectives. Once designated, the authorities should design and implement a management model that prioritizes expanding the protected areas to their natural limits, promoting restoration, and conducting ongoing monitoring of the metrics outlined in this research. Conservation should not merely involve declaring a spatial area as a reserve; it also requires defining these spaces based on tools and geographical knowledge to ensure the adequate protection and conservation of the Lomas and Tillandsiales ecosystems.

Cuadernos de Investigación GeográficaVol. 51(1)
Jorge Basadre Grohmann National University (PE), Universidad Privada de Tacna (PE), Universidad Nacional Intercultural de la Amazonía (PE), Universidad Nacional Intercultural de la Selva Central Juan Santos Atahualpa
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.