Studi Komparatif Pelaksanaan Hukum Likuidasi Perseroan Terbatas oleh RUPS dalam Hukum Indonesia dan Malaysia

This study aims to compare the implementation of liquidation law for Limited Liability Companies (PT) by the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) in Indonesia and Malaysia. In Indonesia, the regulation is governed by Law Number 40 of 2007 in conjunction with Law Number 11 of 2020, while in Malaysia, it is governed under the Companies Act 2016. Although both legal systems share the fundamental principle of protecting creditors and shareholders, their approaches differ significantly. Indonesia’s civil law system emphasizes procedural formalism, while Malaysia’s common law system focuses more on solvency and active creditor involvement. This comparative study finds that Malaysia's practices offer greater administrative efficiency and accountability, which could serve as a model for corporate law reform in Indonesia. The findings aim to support the development of more adaptive, transparent regulations aligned with good corporate governance principles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Deposisi Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Published
2025-06-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v3i2.5049
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Studi Komparatif Pelaksanaan Hukum Likuidasi Perseroan Terbatas oleh RUPS dalam Hukum Indonesia dan Malaysia

Atik Winanti, Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar, Andriyan Rahardi
Deposisi Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

Studi Komparatif Pelaksanaan Hukum Likuidasi Perseroan Terbatas oleh RUPS dalam Hukum Indonesia dan Malaysia

Atik Winanti, Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar, Andriyan Rahardi
article en

Abstract

This study aims to compare the implementation of liquidation law for Limited Liability Companies (PT) by the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) in Indonesia and Malaysia. In Indonesia, the regulation is governed by Law Number 40 of 2007 in conjunction with Law Number 11 of 2020, while in Malaysia, it is governed under the Companies Act 2016. Although both legal systems share the fundamental principle of protecting creditors and shareholders, their approaches differ significantly. Indonesia’s civil law system emphasizes procedural formalism, while Malaysia’s common law system focuses more on solvency and active creditor involvement. This comparative study finds that Malaysia's practices offer greater administrative efficiency and accountability, which could serve as a model for corporate law reform in Indonesia. The findings aim to support the development of more adaptive, transparent regulations aligned with good corporate governance principles.

Deposisi Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu HukumVol. 3(2)
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Studi Komparatif Pelaksanaan Hukum Likuidasi Perseroan Terbatas oleh RUPS dalam Hukum Indonesia dan Malaysia — Atik Winanti, Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar, et al. · Deposisi Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS