Simulated Object Detection in Underwater Environments

This research examines if a computer vision model trained on two simulated environments can perform well when the objects are shown in either environment. The environments were chosen in the context of underwater navigation and are a pool and a murky pond. The data from these environments were trained for object classification using two object detection pipelines: tiered and one-shot. The tiered detector first classifies the environment, and then the object. The one-shot detector only classifies the object. Through our study we found there were no significant differences between the performance of the one-shot and the tiered object detection. With the precision and recall being within 1% for most of the classes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ietc64455.2025.11039487
Primary Topic
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulated Object Detection in Underwater Environments

Bradley M. Whitaker, Laurence White, David H. Jensen, Patrick Morgan
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
article

Simulated Object Detection in Underwater Environments

Bradley M. Whitaker, Laurence White, David H. Jensen, Patrick Morgan
article en

Abstract

This research examines if a computer vision model trained on two simulated environments can perform well when the objects are shown in either environment. The environments were chosen in the context of underwater navigation and are a pool and a murky pond. The data from these environments were trained for object classification using two object detection pipelines: tiered and one-shot. The tiered detector first classifies the environment, and then the object. The one-shot detector only classifies the object. Through our study we found there were no significant differences between the performance of the one-shot and the tiered object detection. With the precision and recall being within 1% for most of the classes.

Montana State University (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.