The Relationship Between the Concepts of “Legal Literacy”, “Legal Nurturing”, “Legal Education”, “Legal Information” and “Legal Learning”

Introduction: the use of the concepts of literacy, nurturing, education, information, and learning in relation to legal categories leads to unjustified confusion and the creation of a false synonymous series. In the framework of the paper, it is proposed to make a primary distinction between these concepts. Based on the analysis of the selected papers (see the list of references), as well as the regulatory legal acts, the author’s scheme for distinguishing the concepts of “legal literacy,” “legal nurturing,” “legal education,” “legal information,” and “legal learning” is proposed. The purpose of the study is to systematize and differentiate the definitions under study to create a clear semantic field and the possible introduction of the desired units into scientific and legislative circulation. Research methods: the general scientific dialectical, universal scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, structural-functional, formallogical), and the special legal methods (comparative law, formal-legal). Conclusions: the concepts are distinguished, the definitions are given, and the classification of the studied objects is drawn up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Legal Concept
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2025.1.5
Primary Topic
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Relationship Between the Concepts of “Legal Literacy”, “Legal Nurturing”, “Legal Education”, “Legal Information” and “Legal Learning”

Danil Kononenko
1 links
Legal Concept
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
article

The Relationship Between the Concepts of “Legal Literacy”, “Legal Nurturing”, “Legal Education”, “Legal Information” and “Legal Learning”

Danil Kononenko
article en

Abstract

Introduction: the use of the concepts of literacy, nurturing, education, information, and learning in relation to legal categories leads to unjustified confusion and the creation of a false synonymous series. In the framework of the paper, it is proposed to make a primary distinction between these concepts. Based on the analysis of the selected papers (see the list of references), as well as the regulatory legal acts, the author’s scheme for distinguishing the concepts of “legal literacy,” “legal nurturing,” “legal education,” “legal information,” and “legal learning” is proposed. The purpose of the study is to systematize and differentiate the definitions under study to create a clear semantic field and the possible introduction of the desired units into scientific and legislative circulation. Research methods: the general scientific dialectical, universal scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, structural-functional, formallogical), and the special legal methods (comparative law, formal-legal). Conclusions: the concepts are distinguished, the definitions are given, and the classification of the studied objects is drawn up.

Legal ConceptVol. 24(1)
Volgograd State University (RU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.