Nonsense

Abstract Wittgenstein maintained that religion was central to his thinking, yet the concept is distinctly absent from his magnum opus, the Philosophical Investigations. This article explores this apparent paradox by reading Wittgenstein alongside Talal Asad. In doing so, it reveals how Wittgenstein's encounter with non-Western “religion” was critical to what many have identified as the shift from his early to his later work. Moreover, by reading the two thinkers together, the article illuminates crucial moments and notable parallels in their respective oeuvres, particularly with respect to their engagement with the valences of “nonsense.” The article intervenes by contending that the category of religion elucidates the ways in which our ordinary language works in “nonsensical” ways. While this blurs the supposed boundaries between “religious” and “nonreligious” forms of life, nevertheless the article argues that the former might be understood as paradigmatic of how we operate in the latter.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Times
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/26410478-11626569
Primary Topic
Religion and Society Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonsense

Hengameh Ziai
Critical Times
Religion and Society Interactions
article

Nonsense

Hengameh Ziai
article en

Abstract

Abstract Wittgenstein maintained that religion was central to his thinking, yet the concept is distinctly absent from his magnum opus, the Philosophical Investigations. This article explores this apparent paradox by reading Wittgenstein alongside Talal Asad. In doing so, it reveals how Wittgenstein's encounter with non-Western “religion” was critical to what many have identified as the shift from his early to his later work. Moreover, by reading the two thinkers together, the article illuminates crucial moments and notable parallels in their respective oeuvres, particularly with respect to their engagement with the valences of “nonsense.” The article intervenes by contending that the category of religion elucidates the ways in which our ordinary language works in “nonsensical” ways. While this blurs the supposed boundaries between “religious” and “nonreligious” forms of life, nevertheless the article argues that the former might be understood as paradigmatic of how we operate in the latter.

Critical TimesVol. 8(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Religion and Society Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.