Dis/Agreement and Recounting Variety in a Self-Managing Cola Collective

Abstract This article explores the facilitation of productive disagreement within democratic spaces. The research shows that designing democratic organisations around both processes of agreement and spaces of disagreement go hand-in-hand as two sides of developing viable and emancipatory democratic organisations. The latter create the conditions for participants to intervene within power structures and for collectivists to emancipate themselves from organisational conventions. Furthermore, by mapping this opposition onto Beer’s classic variety engineering loop, a novel cybernetic political category is revealed: variety recounting . The findings emerge from a three-year investigation of a democratic cola-collective named Premium Collective , and studies how their unique organisational strategies and policies assisted in their survival of the Covid-19 pandemic. Their use of an open, digital forum allowed them to overcome the challenges of the pandemic despite the beverage industry being among the hardest hit by the virus. This work provides an advance in the design of participatory cybernetics, showing that organisational viability and emancipatory democratic practice are not only mutually compatible, but are tightly interlinked.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systemic Practice and Action Research
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-025-09726-1
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dis/Agreement and Recounting Variety in a Self-Managing Cola Collective

J. Fox
Systemic Practice and Action Research
Design Education and Practice
article

Dis/Agreement and Recounting Variety in a Self-Managing Cola Collective

J. Fox
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article explores the facilitation of productive disagreement within democratic spaces. The research shows that designing democratic organisations around both processes of agreement and spaces of disagreement go hand-in-hand as two sides of developing viable and emancipatory democratic organisations. The latter create the conditions for participants to intervene within power structures and for collectivists to emancipate themselves from organisational conventions. Furthermore, by mapping this opposition onto Beer’s classic variety engineering loop, a novel cybernetic political category is revealed: variety recounting . The findings emerge from a three-year investigation of a democratic cola-collective named Premium Collective , and studies how their unique organisational strategies and policies assisted in their survival of the Covid-19 pandemic. Their use of an open, digital forum allowed them to overcome the challenges of the pandemic despite the beverage industry being among the hardest hit by the virus. This work provides an advance in the design of participatory cybernetics, showing that organisational viability and emancipatory democratic practice are not only mutually compatible, but are tightly interlinked.

Systemic Practice and Action ResearchVol. 38(3)
University of Exeter (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dis/Agreement and Recounting Variety in a Self-Managing Cola Collective — J. Fox · Systemic Practice and Action Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS