Algorithmic Bias and Data Justice: ethical challenges in Artificial Intelligence Systems

This article examines the critical ethical challenges posed by algorithmic bias in artificial intelligence (AI) systems, focusing on its implications for social justice and data equity. Through a systematic review of case studies and theoretical frameworks, we analyze how biased datasets and algorithmic designs perpetuate structural inequalities, particularly affecting marginalized communities. The study highlights key examples, such as gender and racial biases in facial recognition and hiring algorithms, while exploring mitigation strategies rooted in data justice principles. Additionally, we evaluate regulatory responses, including the European Union's AI Act, which proposes a risk-based governance framework. The findings underscore the urgent need for interdisciplinary approaches to develop fairer AI systems that align with ethical standards and human rights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EthAIca
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56294/ai2025159
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithmic Bias and Data Justice: ethical challenges in Artificial Intelligence Systems

Javier González‐Argote, Emilia Urrutia Maldonado, Karina Maldonado
3 citations
EthAIca
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
7.10
article

Algorithmic Bias and Data Justice: ethical challenges in Artificial Intelligence Systems

Javier González‐Argote, Emilia Urrutia Maldonado, Karina Maldonado
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article examines the critical ethical challenges posed by algorithmic bias in artificial intelligence (AI) systems, focusing on its implications for social justice and data equity. Through a systematic review of case studies and theoretical frameworks, we analyze how biased datasets and algorithmic designs perpetuate structural inequalities, particularly affecting marginalized communities. The study highlights key examples, such as gender and racial biases in facial recognition and hiring algorithms, while exploring mitigation strategies rooted in data justice principles. Additionally, we evaluate regulatory responses, including the European Union's AI Act, which proposes a risk-based governance framework. The findings underscore the urgent need for interdisciplinary approaches to develop fairer AI systems that align with ethical standards and human rights.

EthAIcaVol. 4
Centro Uruguayo de Imagenología Molecular (UY), Universidad de Montevideo (UY)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
7.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.