Proposed Framework for LLM-Based Feedback in LEED Assignments

This study investigates the potential of large language models (LLMs) to enhance feedback generation for written assignments, with a focus on Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) projects. Through a systematized review of 70 studies, we identify key trends, including a predominance of structured (52.63%) and argumentative inputs (21.05%) and iterative feedback mechanisms (64.91%), which align with LEED’s criteria-driven workflows. However, gaps remain in addressing technical inputs (3.51%) and scalable automated feedback systems tailored to LEED-specific needs. To address these challenges, a conceptual framework is proposed, emphasizing advanced natural language understanding, real-time iterative feedback, and automated validation systems to support the structured and technical demands of LEED assignments. While this framework offers potential for improving feedback systems in high-stakes educational contexts, further experimental validation is necessary to assess its effectiveness in practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
CIB Conferences
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7771/3067-4883.2036
Primary Topic
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proposed Framework for LLM-Based Feedback in LEED Assignments

Gabriel Castelblanco, Maryam K. Multani, Laura Cruz Castro, Zhenlin Yang
3 links
CIB Conferences
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
article

Proposed Framework for LLM-Based Feedback in LEED Assignments

Gabriel Castelblanco, Maryam K. Multani, Laura Cruz Castro, Zhenlin Yang
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the potential of large language models (LLMs) to enhance feedback generation for written assignments, with a focus on Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) projects. Through a systematized review of 70 studies, we identify key trends, including a predominance of structured (52.63%) and argumentative inputs (21.05%) and iterative feedback mechanisms (64.91%), which align with LEED’s criteria-driven workflows. However, gaps remain in addressing technical inputs (3.51%) and scalable automated feedback systems tailored to LEED-specific needs. To address these challenges, a conceptual framework is proposed, emphasizing advanced natural language understanding, real-time iterative feedback, and automated validation systems to support the structured and technical demands of LEED assignments. While this framework offers potential for improving feedback systems in high-stakes educational contexts, further experimental validation is necessary to assess its effectiveness in practice.

CIB ConferencesVol. 1(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.