Socio-Sustainable Architectural Design Through Ethical Implementation of Generative Design and Artificial Intelligence

The design and valuation of buildings require a weighted assessment of many qualitative and quantitative values; the evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) can potentially enhance this process and the built environment. However, preserving the ethics and social sustainability of architectural design is crucial. Generative Design (GD) can potentially add value to new buildings and improve functionality and sustainability by generating design while weighing many quantitative measures effectively (e.g., functionality, economy, energy performance etc.). Generative AI (GAI) can potentially generate and assess designs based on learning from large sets of quantitative and qualitative data. However, underlying qualitative social, cultural, and ethical values usually considered by architects pose challenges to quantitative GD tools, and GAI faces ethical challenges including bias, transparency, and accountability. These underlying qualitative values can significantly influence the social sustainability of projects. An omission of these values may result in a less comprehensive decision-making process and a built environment that lacks essential qualities. This research utilized a survey of Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) professionals to assess their use of and trust in AI. The focus is on their concerns regarding the ethics of AI implementation and their views on social sustainability values, which may not be considered in AI decision-making. The survey results were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods and laid the ground for the future development of a framework for quantitatively integrating the qualitative variables into collaborative and comprehensive decision-making processes. The goal is to provide a more ethical and sustainable built environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CIB Conferences
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7771/3067-4883.1095
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Architecture and Computational Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socio-Sustainable Architectural Design Through Ethical Implementation of Generative Design and Artificial Intelligence

Erica Cochran Hameen, Pingbo Tang, Yael Netser
1 citations
CIB Conferences
Architecture and Computational Design
9.49
article

Socio-Sustainable Architectural Design Through Ethical Implementation of Generative Design and Artificial Intelligence

Erica Cochran Hameen, Pingbo Tang, Yael Netser
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The design and valuation of buildings require a weighted assessment of many qualitative and quantitative values; the evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) can potentially enhance this process and the built environment. However, preserving the ethics and social sustainability of architectural design is crucial. Generative Design (GD) can potentially add value to new buildings and improve functionality and sustainability by generating design while weighing many quantitative measures effectively (e.g., functionality, economy, energy performance etc.). Generative AI (GAI) can potentially generate and assess designs based on learning from large sets of quantitative and qualitative data. However, underlying qualitative social, cultural, and ethical values usually considered by architects pose challenges to quantitative GD tools, and GAI faces ethical challenges including bias, transparency, and accountability. These underlying qualitative values can significantly influence the social sustainability of projects. An omission of these values may result in a less comprehensive decision-making process and a built environment that lacks essential qualities. This research utilized a survey of Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) professionals to assess their use of and trust in AI. The focus is on their concerns regarding the ethics of AI implementation and their views on social sustainability values, which may not be considered in AI decision-making. The survey results were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods and laid the ground for the future development of a framework for quantitatively integrating the qualitative variables into collaborative and comprehensive decision-making processes. The goal is to provide a more ethical and sustainable built environment.

CIB ConferencesVol. 1(1)
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Carnegie Mellon University
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Architecture and Computational Design
9.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.