The Impact of Allowing ChatGPT on Responses to Different Question Types in a Mid-Term Math Exam

This study investigates the impact of ChatGPT on student perfor­mance in mid-term math exams, focusing on differences in scores across various types of test questions. The findings reveal that students using Chat­GPT exhibited significantly lower average scores compared to their non-GPT counterparts, with more erratic performance patterns. In particular, Chat­GPT users struggled with complex mathematical operations, such as matrix inverses and vector multiplications. Both ChatGPT and Copilot displayed similar levels of consistency, occasionally providing incorrect or mixed an­swers, which may have contributed to the lower performance of GPT users. The study suggests that inadequate preparation and unfamiliarity with us­ing GPT during exams could also have played a role in these results. These findings raise important questions about the integration of AI tools in educa­tion, particularly in subjects like mathematics, where precision is essential. Future research should explore optimal ways to integrate AI tools like Chat­GPT into learning environments to enhance, rather than hinder, academic performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dunakavics
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63684/dk.2025.3.01
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Allowing ChatGPT on Responses to Different Question Types in a Mid-Term Math Exam

László Bognár, Antal Joós
Dunakavics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

The Impact of Allowing ChatGPT on Responses to Different Question Types in a Mid-Term Math Exam

László Bognár, Antal Joós
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of ChatGPT on student perfor­mance in mid-term math exams, focusing on differences in scores across various types of test questions. The findings reveal that students using Chat­GPT exhibited significantly lower average scores compared to their non-GPT counterparts, with more erratic performance patterns. In particular, Chat­GPT users struggled with complex mathematical operations, such as matrix inverses and vector multiplications. Both ChatGPT and Copilot displayed similar levels of consistency, occasionally providing incorrect or mixed an­swers, which may have contributed to the lower performance of GPT users. The study suggests that inadequate preparation and unfamiliarity with us­ing GPT during exams could also have played a role in these results. These findings raise important questions about the integration of AI tools in educa­tion, particularly in subjects like mathematics, where precision is essential. Future research should explore optimal ways to integrate AI tools like Chat­GPT into learning environments to enhance, rather than hinder, academic performance.

DunakavicsVol. 13(3)
University of Dunaújváros (HU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Impact of Allowing ChatGPT on Responses to Different Question Types in a Mid-Term Math Exam — László Bognár, Antal Joós · Dunakavics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS