Identifying Uncertainty in Interpreting Building Regulations through Conservative, Pragmatic, and Romantic Perspectives

This article examines the critical issue of uncertainty in the construction industry, particularly in the realm of automated building code compliance. The study explores Fallman’s framework on how different design perspectives, Conservative, Pragmatic, and Romantic, impact the perception and management of uncertainty within building projects. A theoretical framework based on Fallman's design accounts was employed to guide semi-structured interviews with industry professionals, uncovering how uncertainty influences design and regulatory processes, particularly in the context of building permits. Findings demonstrate that each design perspective offers unique strengths and limitations in handling uncertainty: Conservative approaches favour strict rule adherence, Pragmatic strategies emphasize flexibility and contextual adaptation, and Romantic approaches highlight creative problem-solving and intuition. The study underscores the need to integrate these diverse perspectives to enhance the effectiveness of automated rule-checking systems in construction. By acknowledging and balancing these perspectives, the research offers valuable insights for both construction professionals and policymakers, aiming to improve project outcomes, streamline regulatory compliance, and support the integration of uncertainty into digital tools. This nuanced understanding of uncertainty presents opportunities for more adaptive and efficient construction practices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
CIB Conferences
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7771/3067-4883.1726
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Uncertainty in Interpreting Building Regulations through Conservative, Pragmatic, and Romantic Perspectives

Nawari O. Nawari, Peter Nørkjær Gade, Judith Fauth, Mouloud Messaoudi et al.
CIB Conferences
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
article

Identifying Uncertainty in Interpreting Building Regulations through Conservative, Pragmatic, and Romantic Perspectives

Nawari O. Nawari, Peter Nørkjær Gade, Judith Fauth, Mouloud Messaoudi, Jonas Goul Pedersen, Eilif Hjelseth
article en

Abstract

This article examines the critical issue of uncertainty in the construction industry, particularly in the realm of automated building code compliance. The study explores Fallman’s framework on how different design perspectives, Conservative, Pragmatic, and Romantic, impact the perception and management of uncertainty within building projects. A theoretical framework based on Fallman's design accounts was employed to guide semi-structured interviews with industry professionals, uncovering how uncertainty influences design and regulatory processes, particularly in the context of building permits. Findings demonstrate that each design perspective offers unique strengths and limitations in handling uncertainty: Conservative approaches favour strict rule adherence, Pragmatic strategies emphasize flexibility and contextual adaptation, and Romantic approaches highlight creative problem-solving and intuition. The study underscores the need to integrate these diverse perspectives to enhance the effectiveness of automated rule-checking systems in construction. By acknowledging and balancing these perspectives, the research offers valuable insights for both construction professionals and policymakers, aiming to improve project outcomes, streamline regulatory compliance, and support the integration of uncertainty into digital tools. This nuanced understanding of uncertainty presents opportunities for more adaptive and efficient construction practices.

CIB ConferencesVol. 1(1)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.